The OSA-5

Development and validation of a brief questionnaire screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in children

Han Jie Soh, Katherine Rowe, Margot J. Davey, Rosemary S.C. Horne, Gillian M. Nixon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To develop and test a screening tool based on the OSA-18 questionnaire for triage of referrals for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children. Study design: Consecutive children aged >2y without major comorbidities referred for polysomnography (PSG) or overnight oximetry for suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) between 11 January and 31 May 2017 were included. OSA was defined by an obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (OAHI) >1event/h on PSG or an abnormal overnight oximetry (McGill Oximetry Score 2–4). An 11-item questionnaire derived from a previous validation study of the OSA-18 underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation. ANOVA identified questions associated with the presence of OSA. This informed a 5-question, 4-category instrument, scored 0–15 (the OSA-5), that was tested prospectively on 112 children having PSG. Results: 420 children (2.0–17.9y, 43% female) met the inclusion criteria, including 366 complete questionnaires. EFA resulted in a 3-factor structure. ANOVA identified 5 questions from one factor that were independently associated with a diagnosis of OSA: snoring, breath holding, choking, mouth breathing and parental concern. Mean OSA-5 scores with and without OSA were 7.7 vs 4.5 (p < 0.001). Thirty-four percent (60/178) had a total score <5/15, with a sensitivity at this threshold for OSA of 82% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%. Similar results were obtained when tested prospectively, including a sensitivity of 82% and NPV of 81% for the presence of moderate/severe OSA (OAHI>5/h). Conclusion: The OSA-5 is a simple questionnaire that performs well as a triage screening tool to identify those children at risk of OSA among large numbers of referrals for SDB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-66
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume113
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Factor analysis
  • OSA-18
  • Snoring

Cite this

@article{5c892bd1bee542da8038c961ea158fe9,
title = "The OSA-5: Development and validation of a brief questionnaire screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in children",
abstract = "Objective: To develop and test a screening tool based on the OSA-18 questionnaire for triage of referrals for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children. Study design: Consecutive children aged >2y without major comorbidities referred for polysomnography (PSG) or overnight oximetry for suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) between 11 January and 31 May 2017 were included. OSA was defined by an obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (OAHI) >1event/h on PSG or an abnormal overnight oximetry (McGill Oximetry Score 2–4). An 11-item questionnaire derived from a previous validation study of the OSA-18 underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation. ANOVA identified questions associated with the presence of OSA. This informed a 5-question, 4-category instrument, scored 0–15 (the OSA-5), that was tested prospectively on 112 children having PSG. Results: 420 children (2.0–17.9y, 43{\%} female) met the inclusion criteria, including 366 complete questionnaires. EFA resulted in a 3-factor structure. ANOVA identified 5 questions from one factor that were independently associated with a diagnosis of OSA: snoring, breath holding, choking, mouth breathing and parental concern. Mean OSA-5 scores with and without OSA were 7.7 vs 4.5 (p < 0.001). Thirty-four percent (60/178) had a total score <5/15, with a sensitivity at this threshold for OSA of 82{\%} and negative predictive value (NPV) of 70{\%}. Similar results were obtained when tested prospectively, including a sensitivity of 82{\%} and NPV of 81{\%} for the presence of moderate/severe OSA (OAHI>5/h). Conclusion: The OSA-5 is a simple questionnaire that performs well as a triage screening tool to identify those children at risk of OSA among large numbers of referrals for SDB.",
keywords = "Factor analysis, OSA-18, Snoring",
author = "Soh, {Han Jie} and Katherine Rowe and Davey, {Margot J.} and Horne, {Rosemary S.C.} and Nixon, {Gillian M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.07.029",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "62--66",
journal = "International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology",
issn = "0165-5876",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The OSA-5 : Development and validation of a brief questionnaire screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in children. / Soh, Han Jie; Rowe, Katherine; Davey, Margot J.; Horne, Rosemary S.C.; Nixon, Gillian M.

In: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Vol. 113, 01.10.2018, p. 62-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The OSA-5

T2 - Development and validation of a brief questionnaire screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in children

AU - Soh, Han Jie

AU - Rowe, Katherine

AU - Davey, Margot J.

AU - Horne, Rosemary S.C.

AU - Nixon, Gillian M.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Objective: To develop and test a screening tool based on the OSA-18 questionnaire for triage of referrals for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children. Study design: Consecutive children aged >2y without major comorbidities referred for polysomnography (PSG) or overnight oximetry for suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) between 11 January and 31 May 2017 were included. OSA was defined by an obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (OAHI) >1event/h on PSG or an abnormal overnight oximetry (McGill Oximetry Score 2–4). An 11-item questionnaire derived from a previous validation study of the OSA-18 underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation. ANOVA identified questions associated with the presence of OSA. This informed a 5-question, 4-category instrument, scored 0–15 (the OSA-5), that was tested prospectively on 112 children having PSG. Results: 420 children (2.0–17.9y, 43% female) met the inclusion criteria, including 366 complete questionnaires. EFA resulted in a 3-factor structure. ANOVA identified 5 questions from one factor that were independently associated with a diagnosis of OSA: snoring, breath holding, choking, mouth breathing and parental concern. Mean OSA-5 scores with and without OSA were 7.7 vs 4.5 (p < 0.001). Thirty-four percent (60/178) had a total score <5/15, with a sensitivity at this threshold for OSA of 82% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%. Similar results were obtained when tested prospectively, including a sensitivity of 82% and NPV of 81% for the presence of moderate/severe OSA (OAHI>5/h). Conclusion: The OSA-5 is a simple questionnaire that performs well as a triage screening tool to identify those children at risk of OSA among large numbers of referrals for SDB.

AB - Objective: To develop and test a screening tool based on the OSA-18 questionnaire for triage of referrals for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children. Study design: Consecutive children aged >2y without major comorbidities referred for polysomnography (PSG) or overnight oximetry for suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) between 11 January and 31 May 2017 were included. OSA was defined by an obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (OAHI) >1event/h on PSG or an abnormal overnight oximetry (McGill Oximetry Score 2–4). An 11-item questionnaire derived from a previous validation study of the OSA-18 underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation. ANOVA identified questions associated with the presence of OSA. This informed a 5-question, 4-category instrument, scored 0–15 (the OSA-5), that was tested prospectively on 112 children having PSG. Results: 420 children (2.0–17.9y, 43% female) met the inclusion criteria, including 366 complete questionnaires. EFA resulted in a 3-factor structure. ANOVA identified 5 questions from one factor that were independently associated with a diagnosis of OSA: snoring, breath holding, choking, mouth breathing and parental concern. Mean OSA-5 scores with and without OSA were 7.7 vs 4.5 (p < 0.001). Thirty-four percent (60/178) had a total score <5/15, with a sensitivity at this threshold for OSA of 82% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 70%. Similar results were obtained when tested prospectively, including a sensitivity of 82% and NPV of 81% for the presence of moderate/severe OSA (OAHI>5/h). Conclusion: The OSA-5 is a simple questionnaire that performs well as a triage screening tool to identify those children at risk of OSA among large numbers of referrals for SDB.

KW - Factor analysis

KW - OSA-18

KW - Snoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050310161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.07.029

DO - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.07.029

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 62

EP - 66

JO - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

JF - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

SN - 0165-5876

ER -