The on-ground feasibility of a waterless barrier to stop the spread of invasive cane toads in Western Australia

Emily Gregg, Reid Tingley, Ben Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Modeling suggests that excluding invasive cane toads from artificial water points (e.g., pastoral dams) along an arid coastal corridor in Western Australia would create a “waterless barrier” halting their spread. In this study, we explored one critical assumption of these models: that toads cannot persist in the corridor during the dry season without access to artificial water points. We explicitly tested this assumption by translocating and radio-tracking 78 male cane toads in the proposed barrier region during the dry season. Telemetered toads moved substantial distances (maximum distance >2.5 km/night) and were adept at finding shelter. Nonetheless, toads experienced high water loss rates (1.89%/hr) and rapid mortality in both desert (mean ± SD = 43.6 hr ±1.4) and coastal (24.5 hr ±1.2) habitats. Survival analysis suggested that toads could survive a maximum of 5 days without access to surface water and would move a maximum of 5.35 km in this time. Our results confirm that artificial water points are a critical resource for toads in the proposed barrier region and provide further evidence that the waterless barrier could successfully halt toad expansion in Western Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Article number12
Pages (from-to)e74
JournalConservation Science and Practice
Volume1
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2019

Keywords

  • habitat use
  • invasion
  • invasion ecology
  • invasive species
  • management strategies
  • pest control
  • pest management
  • telemetry

Cite this

@article{09f3b13b02d74fc2ac03e5548436f163,
title = "The on-ground feasibility of a waterless barrier to stop the spread of invasive cane toads in Western Australia",
abstract = "Modeling suggests that excluding invasive cane toads from artificial water points (e.g., pastoral dams) along an arid coastal corridor in Western Australia would create a “waterless barrier” halting their spread. In this study, we explored one critical assumption of these models: that toads cannot persist in the corridor during the dry season without access to artificial water points. We explicitly tested this assumption by translocating and radio-tracking 78 male cane toads in the proposed barrier region during the dry season. Telemetered toads moved substantial distances (maximum distance >2.5 km/night) and were adept at finding shelter. Nonetheless, toads experienced high water loss rates (1.89{\%}/hr) and rapid mortality in both desert (mean ± SD = 43.6 hr ±1.4) and coastal (24.5 hr ±1.2) habitats. Survival analysis suggested that toads could survive a maximum of 5 days without access to surface water and would move a maximum of 5.35 km in this time. Our results confirm that artificial water points are a critical resource for toads in the proposed barrier region and provide further evidence that the waterless barrier could successfully halt toad expansion in Western Australia.",
keywords = "habitat use, invasion, invasion ecology, invasive species, management strategies, pest control, pest management, telemetry",
author = "Emily Gregg and Reid Tingley and Ben Phillips",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1111/csp2.74",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "e74",
journal = "Conservation Science and Practice",
issn = "2578-4854",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "8",

}

The on-ground feasibility of a waterless barrier to stop the spread of invasive cane toads in Western Australia. / Gregg, Emily; Tingley, Reid; Phillips, Ben.

In: Conservation Science and Practice, Vol. 1, No. 8, 12, 18.06.2019, p. e74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The on-ground feasibility of a waterless barrier to stop the spread of invasive cane toads in Western Australia

AU - Gregg, Emily

AU - Tingley, Reid

AU - Phillips, Ben

PY - 2019/6/18

Y1 - 2019/6/18

N2 - Modeling suggests that excluding invasive cane toads from artificial water points (e.g., pastoral dams) along an arid coastal corridor in Western Australia would create a “waterless barrier” halting their spread. In this study, we explored one critical assumption of these models: that toads cannot persist in the corridor during the dry season without access to artificial water points. We explicitly tested this assumption by translocating and radio-tracking 78 male cane toads in the proposed barrier region during the dry season. Telemetered toads moved substantial distances (maximum distance >2.5 km/night) and were adept at finding shelter. Nonetheless, toads experienced high water loss rates (1.89%/hr) and rapid mortality in both desert (mean ± SD = 43.6 hr ±1.4) and coastal (24.5 hr ±1.2) habitats. Survival analysis suggested that toads could survive a maximum of 5 days without access to surface water and would move a maximum of 5.35 km in this time. Our results confirm that artificial water points are a critical resource for toads in the proposed barrier region and provide further evidence that the waterless barrier could successfully halt toad expansion in Western Australia.

AB - Modeling suggests that excluding invasive cane toads from artificial water points (e.g., pastoral dams) along an arid coastal corridor in Western Australia would create a “waterless barrier” halting their spread. In this study, we explored one critical assumption of these models: that toads cannot persist in the corridor during the dry season without access to artificial water points. We explicitly tested this assumption by translocating and radio-tracking 78 male cane toads in the proposed barrier region during the dry season. Telemetered toads moved substantial distances (maximum distance >2.5 km/night) and were adept at finding shelter. Nonetheless, toads experienced high water loss rates (1.89%/hr) and rapid mortality in both desert (mean ± SD = 43.6 hr ±1.4) and coastal (24.5 hr ±1.2) habitats. Survival analysis suggested that toads could survive a maximum of 5 days without access to surface water and would move a maximum of 5.35 km in this time. Our results confirm that artificial water points are a critical resource for toads in the proposed barrier region and provide further evidence that the waterless barrier could successfully halt toad expansion in Western Australia.

KW - habitat use

KW - invasion

KW - invasion ecology

KW - invasive species

KW - management strategies

KW - pest control

KW - pest management

KW - telemetry

U2 - 10.1111/csp2.74

DO - 10.1111/csp2.74

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - e74

JO - Conservation Science and Practice

JF - Conservation Science and Practice

SN - 2578-4854

IS - 8

M1 - 12

ER -