The Non-arbitrariness of Reasons: Reply to Lenman

Michael Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

James Lenman is critical of my claim that moral requirements are requirements of reason. I argue that his criticisms miss their target. More importantly, I argue that the anti-rationalism that informs Lenman’s criticisms is itself implausible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-193
Number of pages16
JournalUtilitas
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1999
Externally publishedYes

Cite this