The Need for Speed? The Relationships between Driver Traits and Speed Choices during a Naturalistic Drive

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperResearch

Abstract

Questionnaire based studies and those using driving simulators have provided convincing data that drivers prone to becoming angry drive faster. In contrast, anxious drivers tend to be more cautious in their driving style. Only a few studies have examined this in real traffic conditions, and these have often relied on an experimenter or instructor being present in the vehicle, which may confound the results. The aim of the current study was to examine the relationships between anxiety and anger traits, driver mood and speed and braking behavior while driving in real traffic conditions without an observer present in the vehicle. A total of 19 drivers (males = 12, mean age = 30.84, ± 7.88 years) holding a valid, full Victorian driver license, participated in the study. Drivers drove an instrumented vehicle along a predetermined 38 km route in the south-eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Mood (tension, sadness, anger, vigor, confusion and happiness) was measured before and after the drive and anger and anxiety propensities were also obtained. Drivers were also asked to think aloud during the drive, and verbal assessments of the driving situation were recorded. Overall, trait propensities for anger and anxiety were low, and this was evidenced by low levels of negative mood states both before and after the drive and no significant changes in these moods across the drive. However, despite the low propensities for anger and anxiety while driving, anger and anxiety shared relationships with speed and braking behaviors. Over the entire drive, drivers prone to anxiety tended to exhibit more braking behavior, but no differences in average or variation of speed emerged. In contrast, trait anger propensities were unrelated to driver behavior; however, drivers who had slower speeds throughout the drive tended to have increased anger at the end of the drive and also tended to discuss speed more as they got closer to the end of the drive.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProcedia Manufacturing
Subtitle of host publication6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015
PublisherElsevier BV
Pages3200-3207
Number of pages8
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
EventInternational Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics 2015 - Las Vegas NV USA, Las Vegas, United States of America
Duration: 26 Jul 201530 Jul 2015
Conference number: 6th
http://www.globaleventslist.elsevier.com/events/2015/07/ahfe-2015-6th-international-conference-on-applied-human-factors-and-ergonomics-2015-and-the-affiliated-conferences/

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics 2015
Abbreviated titleAHFE 2015
CountryUnited States of America
CityLas Vegas
Period26/07/1530/07/15
Internet address

Keywords

  • Anger
  • Anxiety
  • Naturalistic driving
  • Speed choices
  • Traits

Cite this

Stephens, A. N., Young, K. L., Logan, D. B., & Lenné, M. G. (2015). The Need for Speed? The Relationships between Driver Traits and Speed Choices during a Naturalistic Drive. In Procedia Manufacturing: 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015 (Vol. 3, pp. 3200-3207). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.870
Stephens, Amanda N. ; Young, Kristie L. ; Logan, David B. ; Lenné, Michael G. / The Need for Speed? The Relationships between Driver Traits and Speed Choices during a Naturalistic Drive. Procedia Manufacturing: 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015. Vol. 3 Elsevier BV, 2015. pp. 3200-3207
@inproceedings{f1af859ab0dd4ababb20a1b82a719617,
title = "The Need for Speed? The Relationships between Driver Traits and Speed Choices during a Naturalistic Drive",
abstract = "Questionnaire based studies and those using driving simulators have provided convincing data that drivers prone to becoming angry drive faster. In contrast, anxious drivers tend to be more cautious in their driving style. Only a few studies have examined this in real traffic conditions, and these have often relied on an experimenter or instructor being present in the vehicle, which may confound the results. The aim of the current study was to examine the relationships between anxiety and anger traits, driver mood and speed and braking behavior while driving in real traffic conditions without an observer present in the vehicle. A total of 19 drivers (males = 12, mean age = 30.84, ± 7.88 years) holding a valid, full Victorian driver license, participated in the study. Drivers drove an instrumented vehicle along a predetermined 38 km route in the south-eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Mood (tension, sadness, anger, vigor, confusion and happiness) was measured before and after the drive and anger and anxiety propensities were also obtained. Drivers were also asked to think aloud during the drive, and verbal assessments of the driving situation were recorded. Overall, trait propensities for anger and anxiety were low, and this was evidenced by low levels of negative mood states both before and after the drive and no significant changes in these moods across the drive. However, despite the low propensities for anger and anxiety while driving, anger and anxiety shared relationships with speed and braking behaviors. Over the entire drive, drivers prone to anxiety tended to exhibit more braking behavior, but no differences in average or variation of speed emerged. In contrast, trait anger propensities were unrelated to driver behavior; however, drivers who had slower speeds throughout the drive tended to have increased anger at the end of the drive and also tended to discuss speed more as they got closer to the end of the drive.",
keywords = "Anger, Anxiety, Naturalistic driving, Speed choices, Traits",
author = "Stephens, {Amanda N.} and Young, {Kristie L.} and Logan, {David B.} and Lenn{\'e}, {Michael G.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.870",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "3200--3207",
booktitle = "Procedia Manufacturing",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Stephens, AN, Young, KL, Logan, DB & Lenné, MG 2015, The Need for Speed? The Relationships between Driver Traits and Speed Choices during a Naturalistic Drive. in Procedia Manufacturing: 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015. vol. 3, Elsevier BV, pp. 3200-3207, International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics 2015, Las Vegas, United States of America, 26/07/15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.870

The Need for Speed? The Relationships between Driver Traits and Speed Choices during a Naturalistic Drive. / Stephens, Amanda N.; Young, Kristie L.; Logan, David B.; Lenné, Michael G.

Procedia Manufacturing: 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015. Vol. 3 Elsevier BV, 2015. p. 3200-3207.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperResearch

TY - GEN

T1 - The Need for Speed? The Relationships between Driver Traits and Speed Choices during a Naturalistic Drive

AU - Stephens, Amanda N.

AU - Young, Kristie L.

AU - Logan, David B.

AU - Lenné, Michael G.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Questionnaire based studies and those using driving simulators have provided convincing data that drivers prone to becoming angry drive faster. In contrast, anxious drivers tend to be more cautious in their driving style. Only a few studies have examined this in real traffic conditions, and these have often relied on an experimenter or instructor being present in the vehicle, which may confound the results. The aim of the current study was to examine the relationships between anxiety and anger traits, driver mood and speed and braking behavior while driving in real traffic conditions without an observer present in the vehicle. A total of 19 drivers (males = 12, mean age = 30.84, ± 7.88 years) holding a valid, full Victorian driver license, participated in the study. Drivers drove an instrumented vehicle along a predetermined 38 km route in the south-eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Mood (tension, sadness, anger, vigor, confusion and happiness) was measured before and after the drive and anger and anxiety propensities were also obtained. Drivers were also asked to think aloud during the drive, and verbal assessments of the driving situation were recorded. Overall, trait propensities for anger and anxiety were low, and this was evidenced by low levels of negative mood states both before and after the drive and no significant changes in these moods across the drive. However, despite the low propensities for anger and anxiety while driving, anger and anxiety shared relationships with speed and braking behaviors. Over the entire drive, drivers prone to anxiety tended to exhibit more braking behavior, but no differences in average or variation of speed emerged. In contrast, trait anger propensities were unrelated to driver behavior; however, drivers who had slower speeds throughout the drive tended to have increased anger at the end of the drive and also tended to discuss speed more as they got closer to the end of the drive.

AB - Questionnaire based studies and those using driving simulators have provided convincing data that drivers prone to becoming angry drive faster. In contrast, anxious drivers tend to be more cautious in their driving style. Only a few studies have examined this in real traffic conditions, and these have often relied on an experimenter or instructor being present in the vehicle, which may confound the results. The aim of the current study was to examine the relationships between anxiety and anger traits, driver mood and speed and braking behavior while driving in real traffic conditions without an observer present in the vehicle. A total of 19 drivers (males = 12, mean age = 30.84, ± 7.88 years) holding a valid, full Victorian driver license, participated in the study. Drivers drove an instrumented vehicle along a predetermined 38 km route in the south-eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Mood (tension, sadness, anger, vigor, confusion and happiness) was measured before and after the drive and anger and anxiety propensities were also obtained. Drivers were also asked to think aloud during the drive, and verbal assessments of the driving situation were recorded. Overall, trait propensities for anger and anxiety were low, and this was evidenced by low levels of negative mood states both before and after the drive and no significant changes in these moods across the drive. However, despite the low propensities for anger and anxiety while driving, anger and anxiety shared relationships with speed and braking behaviors. Over the entire drive, drivers prone to anxiety tended to exhibit more braking behavior, but no differences in average or variation of speed emerged. In contrast, trait anger propensities were unrelated to driver behavior; however, drivers who had slower speeds throughout the drive tended to have increased anger at the end of the drive and also tended to discuss speed more as they got closer to the end of the drive.

KW - Anger

KW - Anxiety

KW - Naturalistic driving

KW - Speed choices

KW - Traits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009844487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.870

DO - 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.870

M3 - Conference Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85009844487

VL - 3

SP - 3200

EP - 3207

BT - Procedia Manufacturing

PB - Elsevier BV

ER -

Stephens AN, Young KL, Logan DB, Lenné MG. The Need for Speed? The Relationships between Driver Traits and Speed Choices during a Naturalistic Drive. In Procedia Manufacturing: 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015. Vol. 3. Elsevier BV. 2015. p. 3200-3207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.870