The MFN clause in investment law and arbitration: a developing countries perspective

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Application of the most-favored-nation (MFN) clauses by investor-state arbitral tribunals has given rise to various controversies. This chapter discusses the experience of developing countries in this regard. While application of MFN to the substantive and procedural standards in International Investment Agreements (IIAs) has overly benefited investors from the developed countries, such application has not been favorable to the developing host-states. Accordingly, some developing countries have undertaken significant MFN reforms in their recent IIAs. This chapter illustrates such reforms with reference to the specific reforms undertaken by Argentina, India, and the Southern African Development Community. The chapter argues that while restraining the scope of MFN clauses may help the developing countries to preserve greater regulatory power in their hands, complete omission of MFN from IIAs may be discouraging for the foreign investors. Therefore, the developing countries should aim to maintain a balance in reforming MFN in the future.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of International Investment Law and Policy
EditorsJulien Chaisse, Leïla Choukroune, Sufian Jusoh
Place of PublicationSingapore Singapore
PublisherSpringer
Number of pages40
ISBN (Electronic)9789811357442
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • MFN
  • Reforms
  • Developing countries
  • Investor-state arbitration

Cite this

Sharmin, T. (2020). The MFN clause in investment law and arbitration: a developing countries perspective. In J. Chaisse, L. Choukroune, & S. Jusoh (Eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5744-2_92-1