The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility

Bruce R. Beattie; Jeffrey T. LaFrance

doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x

The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility

Bruce R. Beattie, Jeffrey T. LaFrance

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	263-271
Number of pages	9
Journal	Review of Agricultural Economics
Volume	28
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2006
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x

Link to publication in Scopus

Cite this

@article{26a48851ed0a4afa8b44560e6ab98d58,

title = "The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility",

abstract = "Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.",

author = "Beattie, {Bruce R.} and LaFrance, {Jeffrey T.}",

year = "2006",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "263--271",

journal = "Review of Agricultural Economics",

issn = "1058-7195",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility

AU - Beattie, Bruce R.

AU - LaFrance, Jeffrey T.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.

AB - Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646018586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 263

EP - 271

JO - Review of Agricultural Economics

JF - Review of Agricultural Economics

SN - 1058-7195

IS - 2

ER -