The LAS VEGAS risk score for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications: An observational study

Ary Serpa Neto, Luiz Guilherme Villares da Costa, Sabrine N.T. Hemmes, Jaume Canet, Göran Hedenstierna, Samir Jaber, Michael Hiesmayr, Markus W. Hollmann, Gary H. Mills, Marcos F. Vidal Melo, Rupert Pearse, Christian Putensen, Werner Schmid, Paolo Severgnini, Hermann Wrigge, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Paolo Pelosi, Marcus J. Schultz, The LAS VEGAS investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently used pre-operative prediction scores for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) use patient data and expected surgery characteristics exclusively. However, intra-operative events are also associated with the development of PPCs. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a new prediction score for PPCs that uses both pre-operative and intra-operative data. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of the LAS VEGAS study, a large international, multicentre, prospective study. SETTINGS: A total of 146 hospitals across 29 countries. PATIENTS: Adult patients requiring intra-operative ventilation during general anaesthesia for surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The cohort was randomly divided into a development subsample to construct a predictive model, and a subsample for validation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction performance of developed models for PPCs. RESULTS: Of the 6063 patients analysed, 10.9% developed at least one PPC. Regression modelling identified 13 independent risk factors for PPCs: six patient characteristics [higher age, higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical score, pre-operative anaemia, pre-operative lower SpO2 and a history of active cancer or obstructive sleep apnoea], two procedure-related features (urgent or emergency surgery and surgery lasting ≥ 1 h), and five intra-operative events [use of an airway other than a supraglottic device, the use of intravenous anaesthetic agents along with volatile agents (balanced anaesthesia), intra-operative desaturation, higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressures > 3 cmH2O and use of vasopressors]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the LAS VEGAS risk score for prediction of PPCs was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.76 to 0.80] for the development subsample and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.76) for the validation subsample. CONCLUSION: The LAS VEGAS risk score including 13 peri-operative characteristics has a moderate discriminative ability for prediction of PPCs. External validation is needed before use in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01601223.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-701
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2018
Externally publishedYes

Cite this