The informatics capability maturity of integrated primary care centres in Australia

Siaw-Teng Liaw, Rachael Kearns, Jane Taggart, Oliver Frank, Riki Lane, Michael Tam, Sarah Dennis, Christine Walker, Grant Russell, Mark Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Integrated primary care requires systems and service integration along with financial incentives to promote downward substitution to a single entry point to care. Integrated Primary Care Centres (IPCCs) aim to improve integration by co-location of health services. The Informatics Capability Maturity (ICM) describes how well health organisations collect, manage and share information; manage eHealth technology, implementation, change, data quality and governance; and use “intelligence” to improve care. Aim Describe associations of ICM with systems and service integration in IPCCs. Methods Mixed methods evaluation of IPCCs in metropolitan and rural Australia: an enhanced general practice, four GP Super Clinics, a “HealthOne” (private-public partnership) and a Community Health Centre. Data collection methods included self-assessed ICM, document review, interviews, observations in practice and assessment of electronic health record data. Data was analysed and compared across IPCCs. Findings The IPCCs demonstrated a range of funding models, ownership, leadership, organisation and ICM. Digital tools were used with varying effectiveness to collect, use and share data. Connectivity was problematic, requiring “work-arounds” to communicate and share information. The lack of technical, data and software interoperability standards, clinical coding and secure messaging were barriers to data collection, integration and sharing. Strong leadership and governance was important for successful implementation of robust and secure eHealth systems. Patient engagement with eHealth tools was suboptimal. Conclusions ICM is positively associated with integration of data, systems and care. Improved ICM requires a health workforce with eHealth competencies; technical, semantic and software standards; adequate privacy and security; and good governance and leadership.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-97
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume105
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Keywords

  • eHealth
  • Informatics capability maturity
  • Integrated care
  • Integrated primary care centres
  • Integration

Cite this

Liaw, Siaw-Teng ; Kearns, Rachael ; Taggart, Jane ; Frank, Oliver ; Lane, Riki ; Tam, Michael ; Dennis, Sarah ; Walker, Christine ; Russell, Grant ; Harris, Mark. / The informatics capability maturity of integrated primary care centres in Australia. In: International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2017 ; Vol. 105. pp. 89-97.
@article{c5d6f394799d4bbb9f2a25121ee52921,
title = "The informatics capability maturity of integrated primary care centres in Australia",
abstract = "Context Integrated primary care requires systems and service integration along with financial incentives to promote downward substitution to a single entry point to care. Integrated Primary Care Centres (IPCCs) aim to improve integration by co-location of health services. The Informatics Capability Maturity (ICM) describes how well health organisations collect, manage and share information; manage eHealth technology, implementation, change, data quality and governance; and use “intelligence” to improve care. Aim Describe associations of ICM with systems and service integration in IPCCs. Methods Mixed methods evaluation of IPCCs in metropolitan and rural Australia: an enhanced general practice, four GP Super Clinics, a “HealthOne” (private-public partnership) and a Community Health Centre. Data collection methods included self-assessed ICM, document review, interviews, observations in practice and assessment of electronic health record data. Data was analysed and compared across IPCCs. Findings The IPCCs demonstrated a range of funding models, ownership, leadership, organisation and ICM. Digital tools were used with varying effectiveness to collect, use and share data. Connectivity was problematic, requiring “work-arounds” to communicate and share information. The lack of technical, data and software interoperability standards, clinical coding and secure messaging were barriers to data collection, integration and sharing. Strong leadership and governance was important for successful implementation of robust and secure eHealth systems. Patient engagement with eHealth tools was suboptimal. Conclusions ICM is positively associated with integration of data, systems and care. Improved ICM requires a health workforce with eHealth competencies; technical, semantic and software standards; adequate privacy and security; and good governance and leadership.",
keywords = "eHealth, Informatics capability maturity, Integrated care, Integrated primary care centres, Integration",
author = "Siaw-Teng Liaw and Rachael Kearns and Jane Taggart and Oliver Frank and Riki Lane and Michael Tam and Sarah Dennis and Christine Walker and Grant Russell and Mark Harris",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.002",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "89--97",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The informatics capability maturity of integrated primary care centres in Australia. / Liaw, Siaw-Teng; Kearns, Rachael; Taggart, Jane; Frank, Oliver; Lane, Riki; Tam, Michael; Dennis, Sarah; Walker, Christine; Russell, Grant; Harris, Mark.

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 105, 01.09.2017, p. 89-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The informatics capability maturity of integrated primary care centres in Australia

AU - Liaw, Siaw-Teng

AU - Kearns, Rachael

AU - Taggart, Jane

AU - Frank, Oliver

AU - Lane, Riki

AU - Tam, Michael

AU - Dennis, Sarah

AU - Walker, Christine

AU - Russell, Grant

AU - Harris, Mark

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Context Integrated primary care requires systems and service integration along with financial incentives to promote downward substitution to a single entry point to care. Integrated Primary Care Centres (IPCCs) aim to improve integration by co-location of health services. The Informatics Capability Maturity (ICM) describes how well health organisations collect, manage and share information; manage eHealth technology, implementation, change, data quality and governance; and use “intelligence” to improve care. Aim Describe associations of ICM with systems and service integration in IPCCs. Methods Mixed methods evaluation of IPCCs in metropolitan and rural Australia: an enhanced general practice, four GP Super Clinics, a “HealthOne” (private-public partnership) and a Community Health Centre. Data collection methods included self-assessed ICM, document review, interviews, observations in practice and assessment of electronic health record data. Data was analysed and compared across IPCCs. Findings The IPCCs demonstrated a range of funding models, ownership, leadership, organisation and ICM. Digital tools were used with varying effectiveness to collect, use and share data. Connectivity was problematic, requiring “work-arounds” to communicate and share information. The lack of technical, data and software interoperability standards, clinical coding and secure messaging were barriers to data collection, integration and sharing. Strong leadership and governance was important for successful implementation of robust and secure eHealth systems. Patient engagement with eHealth tools was suboptimal. Conclusions ICM is positively associated with integration of data, systems and care. Improved ICM requires a health workforce with eHealth competencies; technical, semantic and software standards; adequate privacy and security; and good governance and leadership.

AB - Context Integrated primary care requires systems and service integration along with financial incentives to promote downward substitution to a single entry point to care. Integrated Primary Care Centres (IPCCs) aim to improve integration by co-location of health services. The Informatics Capability Maturity (ICM) describes how well health organisations collect, manage and share information; manage eHealth technology, implementation, change, data quality and governance; and use “intelligence” to improve care. Aim Describe associations of ICM with systems and service integration in IPCCs. Methods Mixed methods evaluation of IPCCs in metropolitan and rural Australia: an enhanced general practice, four GP Super Clinics, a “HealthOne” (private-public partnership) and a Community Health Centre. Data collection methods included self-assessed ICM, document review, interviews, observations in practice and assessment of electronic health record data. Data was analysed and compared across IPCCs. Findings The IPCCs demonstrated a range of funding models, ownership, leadership, organisation and ICM. Digital tools were used with varying effectiveness to collect, use and share data. Connectivity was problematic, requiring “work-arounds” to communicate and share information. The lack of technical, data and software interoperability standards, clinical coding and secure messaging were barriers to data collection, integration and sharing. Strong leadership and governance was important for successful implementation of robust and secure eHealth systems. Patient engagement with eHealth tools was suboptimal. Conclusions ICM is positively associated with integration of data, systems and care. Improved ICM requires a health workforce with eHealth competencies; technical, semantic and software standards; adequate privacy and security; and good governance and leadership.

KW - eHealth

KW - Informatics capability maturity

KW - Integrated care

KW - Integrated primary care centres

KW - Integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021053419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 89

EP - 97

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

ER -