Abstract
Concerns about the complexity of firm disclosures have prompted regulators to initiate projects to improve the readability of annual reports. We investigate business strategy as a determinant of annual report readability. As business strategy fundamentally determines a firm's product and market domain, technology, and organizational structure, it influences a firm's operating complexity, environmental uncertainty and information asymmetry. Consequently, business strategy frames the level, wording, and complexity of disclosures. We capture a firm's business strategy based on the Miles and Snow (1978) strategic typology and measure 10-K readability with Li's (2008) Fog index. We find that firms pursuing an innovation-oriented prospector strategy have less readable 10-Ks relative to firms pursuing an efficiency-oriented defender strategy. We also find that prospectors display more negative and uncertainty tones while defenders exhibit more litigious tone in their 10-Ks. Our study provides useful insights to policy makers as it suggests that efforts to improve annual report readability may be limited for some firms given that business strategy is a fundamental determinant of readability and pronouncements accommodating different strategic orientations are not feasible.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65-81 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Accounting and Public Policy |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- Annual report readability
- Business strategy
- Fog index
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver