Abstract
A formal proof is offered of the fact that Individualism and Ordinalism imply the controversial condition A3 used by Kemp and Ng (1976) to show the non-existence of an individualistic social welfare function based only on ordinal preferences but objected to by Samuelson (1977) as unreasonable. Mayston's argument against our definition of ordinality is refuted; his notion of 'true ordinality' involves elements of cardinality and/or goes against individualism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 33-37 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Mathematical Social Sciences |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 1982 |
Keywords
- individualism
- ordinalism
- Social welfare function
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver