Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impact of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose on clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes among adults with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Elizabeth Holmes-Truscott
  • , Shaira Baptista
  • , Mathew Ling
  • , Eileen Collins
  • , EIif I. Ekinci
  • , John Furler
  • , Virginia Hagger
  • , Jo Anne Manski-Nankervis
  • , Caroline Wells
  • , Jane Speight

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is considered of little clinical benefit for adults with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, but no comprehensive review of a structured approach to SMBG has been published to date. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of sSMBG on HbA1c, treatment modifications, behavioral and psychosocial outcomes, and; examine the moderating effects of sSMBG protocol characteristics on HbA1c. Data sources: Four databases searched (November 2020; updated: February 2022). Study selection: Inclusion criteria: non-randomized and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies; reporting effect of sSMBG on stated outcomes; among adults (≥18 years) with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Studies excluded if involving children or people with insulin-treated or other forms of diabetes. Data extraction and analysis: Outcome data extracted, and risk of bias/quality assessed independently by two researchers. Meta-analysis was conducted for RCTs, and moderators explored (HbA1c only). Data synthesis: From 2,078 abstracts, k=23 studies were included (N=5,372). Risk of bias was evident and study quality was low. Outcomes assessed included: HbA1c (k=23), treatment modification (k=16), psychosocial/behavioral outcomes (k=12). Meta-analysis revealed a significant mean difference favoring sSMBG in HbA1c (-0·29%, 95% CI: -0·46 to -0·11, k=13) and diabetes self-efficacy (0.17%, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.33, k=2). Meta-analysis revealed no significant moderating effects by protocol characteristics. Limitations: Findings limited by heterogeneity in study designs, intervention characteristics, and psychosocial assessments. Conclusion: A small positive effect of sSMBG on HbA1c and diabetes self-efficacy was observed. Narrative synthesis of sSMBG intervention characteristics may guide future implementation. PROSPERO registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020208857, identifier CRD42020208857.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1177030
Number of pages12
JournalFrontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • behavioral outcomes
  • HbA1c
  • meta-analysis
  • psychological outcome
  • self-monitor of blood glucose (SMBG)
  • structured self-monitoring of blood glucose
  • systematic review
  • type 2 diabetes

Cite this