The impact of manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives: A survey comparing make-to-order and make-to-stock firms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Manufacturing firms aim at improving both internal and external processes to improve the competitive advantage. Such initiatives include lean practices as well as supplier rationalization and integration. In this paper, we analyze these improvement initiatives and their impact on business performance. In particular, we explore potential differences between make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS) firms. We use data from 216 Australian manufacturing firms. We find a clear difference of improvement focus between MTO and MTS firms. MTO firms exhibit a significant impact of supplier integration on business performance, but not for lean practices and supplier rationalization. The situation is completely reversed for MTS firms, since they have significant effects for internal lean practices and supplier rationalization, but not for logistics integration with supplier. The results show that the distinction between MTO and MTS firms is important when analyzing manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159 - 165
Number of pages7
JournalOMEGA International Journal of Management Science
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

@article{1db673df9b5b4a45a14040b1e90d44fe,
title = "The impact of manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives: A survey comparing make-to-order and make-to-stock firms",
abstract = "Manufacturing firms aim at improving both internal and external processes to improve the competitive advantage. Such initiatives include lean practices as well as supplier rationalization and integration. In this paper, we analyze these improvement initiatives and their impact on business performance. In particular, we explore potential differences between make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS) firms. We use data from 216 Australian manufacturing firms. We find a clear difference of improvement focus between MTO and MTS firms. MTO firms exhibit a significant impact of supplier integration on business performance, but not for lean practices and supplier rationalization. The situation is completely reversed for MTS firms, since they have significant effects for internal lean practices and supplier rationalization, but not for logistics integration with supplier. The results show that the distinction between MTO and MTS firms is important when analyzing manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives.",
author = "Jan Olhager and Prajogo, {Daniel Indarto}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.omega.2011.05.001",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "159 -- 165",
journal = "OMEGA International Journal of Management Science",
issn = "0305-0483",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

The impact of manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives: A survey comparing make-to-order and make-to-stock firms. / Olhager, Jan; Prajogo, Daniel Indarto.

In: OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2012, p. 159 - 165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives: A survey comparing make-to-order and make-to-stock firms

AU - Olhager, Jan

AU - Prajogo, Daniel Indarto

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Manufacturing firms aim at improving both internal and external processes to improve the competitive advantage. Such initiatives include lean practices as well as supplier rationalization and integration. In this paper, we analyze these improvement initiatives and their impact on business performance. In particular, we explore potential differences between make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS) firms. We use data from 216 Australian manufacturing firms. We find a clear difference of improvement focus between MTO and MTS firms. MTO firms exhibit a significant impact of supplier integration on business performance, but not for lean practices and supplier rationalization. The situation is completely reversed for MTS firms, since they have significant effects for internal lean practices and supplier rationalization, but not for logistics integration with supplier. The results show that the distinction between MTO and MTS firms is important when analyzing manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives.

AB - Manufacturing firms aim at improving both internal and external processes to improve the competitive advantage. Such initiatives include lean practices as well as supplier rationalization and integration. In this paper, we analyze these improvement initiatives and their impact on business performance. In particular, we explore potential differences between make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS) firms. We use data from 216 Australian manufacturing firms. We find a clear difference of improvement focus between MTO and MTS firms. MTO firms exhibit a significant impact of supplier integration on business performance, but not for lean practices and supplier rationalization. The situation is completely reversed for MTS firms, since they have significant effects for internal lean practices and supplier rationalization, but not for logistics integration with supplier. The results show that the distinction between MTO and MTS firms is important when analyzing manufacturing and supply chain improvement initiatives.

U2 - 10.1016/j.omega.2011.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.omega.2011.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 159

EP - 165

JO - OMEGA International Journal of Management Science

JF - OMEGA International Journal of Management Science

SN - 0305-0483

IS - 2

ER -