TY - JOUR
T1 - The ICM research agenda on extracorporeal life support
AU - Combes, Alain
AU - Brodie, Dan
AU - Chen, Yih Sharng
AU - Fan, Eddy
AU - Henriques, José P.S.
AU - Hodgson, Carol
AU - Lepper, Philipp M.
AU - Leprince, Pascal
AU - Maekawa, Kunihiko
AU - Muller, Thomas
AU - Nuding, Sebastian
AU - Ouweneel, Dagmar M.
AU - Roch, Antoine
AU - Schmidt, Matthieu
AU - Takayama, Hiroo
AU - Vuylsteke, Alain
AU - Werdan, Karl
AU - Papazian, Laurent
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to concisely describe the current standards of care, major recent advances, common beliefs that have been contradicted by recent trials, areas of uncertainty, and clinical studies that need to be performed over the next decade and their expected outcomes with regard to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Methods: Narrative review based on a systematic analysis of the medical literature, national and international guidelines, and expert opinion. Results: The use of venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) is increasing in the most severe forms of acute lung injury. In patients with cardiogenic shock, short-term veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) provides both pulmonary and circulatory support. Technological improvements and recently published studies suggest that ECMO is able to improve patients’ outcomes. There are, however, many uncertainties regarding the real benefits of this technique both in hemodynamic and respiratory failure, the territorial organization to deliver ECMO, the indications and the use of concomitant treatments. Conclusions: Although there have been considerable advances regarding the use of ECMO in critically ill patients, the risk/benefit ratio remains underinvestigated. ECMO indications, organization of ECMO delivery, and use of adjuvant therapeutics need also to be explored. Ongoing and future studies may be able to resolve these issues.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to concisely describe the current standards of care, major recent advances, common beliefs that have been contradicted by recent trials, areas of uncertainty, and clinical studies that need to be performed over the next decade and their expected outcomes with regard to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Methods: Narrative review based on a systematic analysis of the medical literature, national and international guidelines, and expert opinion. Results: The use of venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) is increasing in the most severe forms of acute lung injury. In patients with cardiogenic shock, short-term veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) provides both pulmonary and circulatory support. Technological improvements and recently published studies suggest that ECMO is able to improve patients’ outcomes. There are, however, many uncertainties regarding the real benefits of this technique both in hemodynamic and respiratory failure, the territorial organization to deliver ECMO, the indications and the use of concomitant treatments. Conclusions: Although there have been considerable advances regarding the use of ECMO in critically ill patients, the risk/benefit ratio remains underinvestigated. ECMO indications, organization of ECMO delivery, and use of adjuvant therapeutics need also to be explored. Ongoing and future studies may be able to resolve these issues.
KW - Acute respiratory distress syndrome
KW - Cardiogenic shock
KW - Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
KW - Position article
KW - Research agenda
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018986619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-017-4803-3
DO - 10.1007/s00134-017-4803-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85018986619
SN - 0342-4642
VL - 43
SP - 1306
EP - 1318
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
IS - 9
ER -