The IADPSG diagnostic criteria identify women with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Victoria

Sally K. Abell; Helena J. Teede

doi:10.1111/ajo.12676

The IADPSG diagnostic criteria identify women with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Victoria

Sally K. Abell, Helena J. Teede

Health Systems Services & Policy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Controversy remains surrounding International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), including perceived improvement in perinatal outcomes and health service implications. We compared perinatal outcomes for untreated women meeting IADPSG-only criteria and women without GDM in Victoria. Women meeting IADPSG-only criteria were characterised according to fasting and one hour glucose thresholds and by region of birth. IADPSG criteria identified women with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly women born in Australia compared to Asian regions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	564-568
Number of pages	5
Journal	Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume	57
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12676
Publication status	Published - Oct 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

ADIPS
Gestational diabetes
IADPSG criteria
Pregnancy outcome

Access to Document

10.1111/ajo.12676

Cite this

@article{3bf4bcf34cac47b68adf67ff22c9da1d,

title = "The IADPSG diagnostic criteria identify women with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Victoria",

abstract = "Controversy remains surrounding International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), including perceived improvement in perinatal outcomes and health service implications. We compared perinatal outcomes for untreated women meeting IADPSG-only criteria and women without GDM in Victoria. Women meeting IADPSG-only criteria were characterised according to fasting and one hour glucose thresholds and by region of birth. IADPSG criteria identified women with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly women born in Australia compared to Asian regions.",

keywords = "ADIPS, Gestational diabetes, IADPSG criteria, Pregnancy outcome",

author = "Abell, \{Sally K.\} and Teede, \{Helena J.\}",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1111/ajo.12676",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "564--568",

journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",

issn = "0004-8666",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The IADPSG diagnostic criteria identify women with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Victoria

AU - Abell, Sally K.

AU - Teede, Helena J.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Controversy remains surrounding International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), including perceived improvement in perinatal outcomes and health service implications. We compared perinatal outcomes for untreated women meeting IADPSG-only criteria and women without GDM in Victoria. Women meeting IADPSG-only criteria were characterised according to fasting and one hour glucose thresholds and by region of birth. IADPSG criteria identified women with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly women born in Australia compared to Asian regions.

AB - Controversy remains surrounding International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), including perceived improvement in perinatal outcomes and health service implications. We compared perinatal outcomes for untreated women meeting IADPSG-only criteria and women without GDM in Victoria. Women meeting IADPSG-only criteria were characterised according to fasting and one hour glucose thresholds and by region of birth. IADPSG criteria identified women with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly women born in Australia compared to Asian regions.

KW - ADIPS

KW - Gestational diabetes

KW - IADPSG criteria

KW - Pregnancy outcome

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85026306242

U2 - 10.1111/ajo.12676

DO - 10.1111/ajo.12676

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85026306242

SN - 0004-8666

VL - 57

SP - 564

EP - 568

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

IS - 5

ER -

The IADPSG diagnostic criteria identify women with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Victoria

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this