The hierarchy of control in the epidemic of farm injury

James Dosman, Louise Hagel, Nathan King, Niels Koehncke, Shelley Kirychuk, Catherine Trask, Joshua Neudorf, Lesley Day, Don Voaklander, William Pickett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The application of the hierarchy of control (HOC) is a well-established approach to hazardreduction in industrial workplaces. However, it has not been generally applied in farm workplaces.The objective was to determine current practices of farmers in the context of a modified HOC, and theeffect of these practices on farm injury outcomes. A self-reported mail survey of 1196 Saskatchewanfarm operations was conducted in 2013. Selected survey questions were used as proxy measures of thefarm owner-operator’s practices relevant to each of the six steps of increasing importance in a modifiedHOC: (1) hazard identification; (2) risk assessment; (3) personal protection; (4) administrativecontrols; (5) engineering controls; and (6) elimination of the hazard. Analysis used basic descriptivestatistics and logistic regression to examine associations of interest. When four of the six HOC stepswere adhered to, there was a significant protective effect: odds ratio (OR) = 0.32 (95% confidenceinterval [CI]: 0.14–0.74) for any injury and OR = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.07–0.99) for serious injury in theoverall study population. For farm owner-operators utilizing four of the six steps in the modified HOC,there was a significant protective effect for any injury (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11–0.83). Although thereis a considerable absence of use of elements of the HOC among farm operators, for farmers who adhereto these steps, there is a significant reduction in their risk for injury. Prevention strategies that embracethe practice of these principles may be effective in the control of farm workplace injury.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)360-369
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Agromedicine: interface of human health and agriculture
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this