The G & K O'Connor lockout (1999) and its aftermath: A case study of a union avoidance campaign in the Australian meat processing industry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The G K O Connor lockout of the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) members in 1999 was an example of a change in employer strategy with the objective of removing the union from its Pakenham abattoir. Chris Briggs research on the recurrence of the lockout in Australia sees it as an example of a big bang lockout which occurs against the background of legislative changes, a downturn in the meat processing industry, and other factors. This article examines the G K O Connor lockout in detail. It identifies legislative change in the form of the introduction of Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 in providing the company with the opportunity and legal framework to change its industrial relations strategy and weaken the AMIEU. This upsurge in employer militancy was also associated with use of the Federal Government s apprentice and traineeship scheme, anti-union consultants, and tactics such as industrial spies and labour espionage. The lockout, which the stakeholders described as a baseball bat lockout, and subsequent actions by the employer introduced a Pinkerton Incorporated style of culture into Australian industrial relations in which the employer adopted an offensive position against the union using a range of union avoidance tactics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131 - 148
Number of pages18
JournalLabour History
Volume109
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{7a357c40e598488ebb99302426a28446,
title = "The G & K O'Connor lockout (1999) and its aftermath: A case study of a union avoidance campaign in the Australian meat processing industry",
abstract = "The G K O Connor lockout of the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) members in 1999 was an example of a change in employer strategy with the objective of removing the union from its Pakenham abattoir. Chris Briggs research on the recurrence of the lockout in Australia sees it as an example of a big bang lockout which occurs against the background of legislative changes, a downturn in the meat processing industry, and other factors. This article examines the G K O Connor lockout in detail. It identifies legislative change in the form of the introduction of Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 in providing the company with the opportunity and legal framework to change its industrial relations strategy and weaken the AMIEU. This upsurge in employer militancy was also associated with use of the Federal Government s apprentice and traineeship scheme, anti-union consultants, and tactics such as industrial spies and labour espionage. The lockout, which the stakeholders described as a baseball bat lockout, and subsequent actions by the employer introduced a Pinkerton Incorporated style of culture into Australian industrial relations in which the employer adopted an offensive position against the union using a range of union avoidance tactics.",
author = "Jerrard, {Marjorie Ann}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.5263/labourhistory.109.0131",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "131 -- 148",
journal = "Labour History",
issn = "0023-6942",

}

The G & K O'Connor lockout (1999) and its aftermath: A case study of a union avoidance campaign in the Australian meat processing industry. / Jerrard, Marjorie Ann.

In: Labour History, Vol. 109, 2015, p. 131 - 148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The G & K O'Connor lockout (1999) and its aftermath: A case study of a union avoidance campaign in the Australian meat processing industry

AU - Jerrard, Marjorie Ann

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The G K O Connor lockout of the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) members in 1999 was an example of a change in employer strategy with the objective of removing the union from its Pakenham abattoir. Chris Briggs research on the recurrence of the lockout in Australia sees it as an example of a big bang lockout which occurs against the background of legislative changes, a downturn in the meat processing industry, and other factors. This article examines the G K O Connor lockout in detail. It identifies legislative change in the form of the introduction of Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 in providing the company with the opportunity and legal framework to change its industrial relations strategy and weaken the AMIEU. This upsurge in employer militancy was also associated with use of the Federal Government s apprentice and traineeship scheme, anti-union consultants, and tactics such as industrial spies and labour espionage. The lockout, which the stakeholders described as a baseball bat lockout, and subsequent actions by the employer introduced a Pinkerton Incorporated style of culture into Australian industrial relations in which the employer adopted an offensive position against the union using a range of union avoidance tactics.

AB - The G K O Connor lockout of the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) members in 1999 was an example of a change in employer strategy with the objective of removing the union from its Pakenham abattoir. Chris Briggs research on the recurrence of the lockout in Australia sees it as an example of a big bang lockout which occurs against the background of legislative changes, a downturn in the meat processing industry, and other factors. This article examines the G K O Connor lockout in detail. It identifies legislative change in the form of the introduction of Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 in providing the company with the opportunity and legal framework to change its industrial relations strategy and weaken the AMIEU. This upsurge in employer militancy was also associated with use of the Federal Government s apprentice and traineeship scheme, anti-union consultants, and tactics such as industrial spies and labour espionage. The lockout, which the stakeholders described as a baseball bat lockout, and subsequent actions by the employer introduced a Pinkerton Incorporated style of culture into Australian industrial relations in which the employer adopted an offensive position against the union using a range of union avoidance tactics.

UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5263/labourhistory.109.0131

U2 - 10.5263/labourhistory.109.0131

DO - 10.5263/labourhistory.109.0131

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 131

EP - 148

JO - Labour History

JF - Labour History

SN - 0023-6942

ER -