The frog filter: Amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography

Reid Tingley, Christina M. Romagosa, Fred Kraus, David Bickford, Benjamin L. Phillips, Richard Shine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: Invasive species often exhibit a highly non-random suite of traits relative to non-invasive taxa, and these biases reflect strong selection at a series of steps along the invasion pathway. Here we investigate traits that are favoured in the first of these steps: the introduction of species outside their native geographic range. We use the global introduction of amphibians as our case study. Location: Global. Methods: We examined whether taxonomy, body size and attributes of the native geographic range predict the likelihood of an introduction event in amphibians. We then determined whether these characteristics differed between amphibian species that have been introduced intentionally and those that have been introduced unintentionally (i.e. stowaways). Results: Comparisons of introduced and non-introduced amphibians reveal significant biases with respect to taxonomic position (c. 50% of all introduced species originate from only 5% of all families), and characteristics of the native geographic range (most introduced species originate from the Northern Hemisphere, occupy a wide geographic range and are sympatric with high densities of humans). Many of these biases presumably reflect the ease and likelihood of capturing and transporting such animals. Additionally, intentionally introduced species are of larger than average body size, occupy higher elevations in their native ranges, and are more likely to originate from the Northern Hemisphere than unintentionally introduced species. Main conclusions: Introduced amphibian species are not a random subset of the global amphibian fauna with respect to taxonomic affiliation and biogeography, and this restricts our ability to make robust generalizations regarding the ecological determinants of introduction success. Nevertheless, many of our findings are similar to those revealed by previous analyses of vertebrate and invertebrate introductions. Thus, our study suggests that biases in the anthropogenic mechanisms involved in transporting species around the globe are surprisingly consistent across broadly divergent taxa.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)496-503
Number of pages8
JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alien species
  • Amphibians
  • Anura
  • Caudata
  • Introduced species
  • Invasive species
  • Transportation

Cite this

Tingley, Reid ; Romagosa, Christina M. ; Kraus, Fred ; Bickford, David ; Phillips, Benjamin L. ; Shine, Richard. / The frog filter : Amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography. In: Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 496-503.
@article{5063504296d84448ac2a70223d213e69,
title = "The frog filter: Amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography",
abstract = "Aim: Invasive species often exhibit a highly non-random suite of traits relative to non-invasive taxa, and these biases reflect strong selection at a series of steps along the invasion pathway. Here we investigate traits that are favoured in the first of these steps: the introduction of species outside their native geographic range. We use the global introduction of amphibians as our case study. Location: Global. Methods: We examined whether taxonomy, body size and attributes of the native geographic range predict the likelihood of an introduction event in amphibians. We then determined whether these characteristics differed between amphibian species that have been introduced intentionally and those that have been introduced unintentionally (i.e. stowaways). Results: Comparisons of introduced and non-introduced amphibians reveal significant biases with respect to taxonomic position (c. 50{\%} of all introduced species originate from only 5{\%} of all families), and characteristics of the native geographic range (most introduced species originate from the Northern Hemisphere, occupy a wide geographic range and are sympatric with high densities of humans). Many of these biases presumably reflect the ease and likelihood of capturing and transporting such animals. Additionally, intentionally introduced species are of larger than average body size, occupy higher elevations in their native ranges, and are more likely to originate from the Northern Hemisphere than unintentionally introduced species. Main conclusions: Introduced amphibian species are not a random subset of the global amphibian fauna with respect to taxonomic affiliation and biogeography, and this restricts our ability to make robust generalizations regarding the ecological determinants of introduction success. Nevertheless, many of our findings are similar to those revealed by previous analyses of vertebrate and invertebrate introductions. Thus, our study suggests that biases in the anthropogenic mechanisms involved in transporting species around the globe are surprisingly consistent across broadly divergent taxa.",
keywords = "Alien species, Amphibians, Anura, Caudata, Introduced species, Invasive species, Transportation",
author = "Reid Tingley and Romagosa, {Christina M.} and Fred Kraus and David Bickford and Phillips, {Benjamin L.} and Richard Shine",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00530.x",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "496--503",
journal = "Global Ecology and Biogeography",
issn = "1466-822X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

The frog filter : Amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography. / Tingley, Reid; Romagosa, Christina M.; Kraus, Fred; Bickford, David; Phillips, Benjamin L.; Shine, Richard.

In: Global Ecology and Biogeography, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.07.2010, p. 496-503.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The frog filter

T2 - Amphibian introduction bias driven by taxonomy, body size and biogeography

AU - Tingley, Reid

AU - Romagosa, Christina M.

AU - Kraus, Fred

AU - Bickford, David

AU - Phillips, Benjamin L.

AU - Shine, Richard

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - Aim: Invasive species often exhibit a highly non-random suite of traits relative to non-invasive taxa, and these biases reflect strong selection at a series of steps along the invasion pathway. Here we investigate traits that are favoured in the first of these steps: the introduction of species outside their native geographic range. We use the global introduction of amphibians as our case study. Location: Global. Methods: We examined whether taxonomy, body size and attributes of the native geographic range predict the likelihood of an introduction event in amphibians. We then determined whether these characteristics differed between amphibian species that have been introduced intentionally and those that have been introduced unintentionally (i.e. stowaways). Results: Comparisons of introduced and non-introduced amphibians reveal significant biases with respect to taxonomic position (c. 50% of all introduced species originate from only 5% of all families), and characteristics of the native geographic range (most introduced species originate from the Northern Hemisphere, occupy a wide geographic range and are sympatric with high densities of humans). Many of these biases presumably reflect the ease and likelihood of capturing and transporting such animals. Additionally, intentionally introduced species are of larger than average body size, occupy higher elevations in their native ranges, and are more likely to originate from the Northern Hemisphere than unintentionally introduced species. Main conclusions: Introduced amphibian species are not a random subset of the global amphibian fauna with respect to taxonomic affiliation and biogeography, and this restricts our ability to make robust generalizations regarding the ecological determinants of introduction success. Nevertheless, many of our findings are similar to those revealed by previous analyses of vertebrate and invertebrate introductions. Thus, our study suggests that biases in the anthropogenic mechanisms involved in transporting species around the globe are surprisingly consistent across broadly divergent taxa.

AB - Aim: Invasive species often exhibit a highly non-random suite of traits relative to non-invasive taxa, and these biases reflect strong selection at a series of steps along the invasion pathway. Here we investigate traits that are favoured in the first of these steps: the introduction of species outside their native geographic range. We use the global introduction of amphibians as our case study. Location: Global. Methods: We examined whether taxonomy, body size and attributes of the native geographic range predict the likelihood of an introduction event in amphibians. We then determined whether these characteristics differed between amphibian species that have been introduced intentionally and those that have been introduced unintentionally (i.e. stowaways). Results: Comparisons of introduced and non-introduced amphibians reveal significant biases with respect to taxonomic position (c. 50% of all introduced species originate from only 5% of all families), and characteristics of the native geographic range (most introduced species originate from the Northern Hemisphere, occupy a wide geographic range and are sympatric with high densities of humans). Many of these biases presumably reflect the ease and likelihood of capturing and transporting such animals. Additionally, intentionally introduced species are of larger than average body size, occupy higher elevations in their native ranges, and are more likely to originate from the Northern Hemisphere than unintentionally introduced species. Main conclusions: Introduced amphibian species are not a random subset of the global amphibian fauna with respect to taxonomic affiliation and biogeography, and this restricts our ability to make robust generalizations regarding the ecological determinants of introduction success. Nevertheless, many of our findings are similar to those revealed by previous analyses of vertebrate and invertebrate introductions. Thus, our study suggests that biases in the anthropogenic mechanisms involved in transporting species around the globe are surprisingly consistent across broadly divergent taxa.

KW - Alien species

KW - Amphibians

KW - Anura

KW - Caudata

KW - Introduced species

KW - Invasive species

KW - Transportation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954772660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00530.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00530.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954772660

VL - 19

SP - 496

EP - 503

JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography

JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography

SN - 1466-822X

IS - 4

ER -