The flexibility of the records continuum model

a response to Michael Karabinos' "in the shadow of the continuum"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In an article entitled “In the shadow of the continuum: testing the records continuum model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘Migrated Archives’” published in Archival Science in 2018, Michael Karabinos argued that the Records Continuum Model cannot be applied if the records under scrutiny have not been pluralised and that openness and accessibility are keys to the functionality of the model. He proposed a “shadow continuum” to analyse the Migrated Archives when its existence was unknown to the public. The author of this response believes that Karabinos’ analysis is based on a misunderstanding of the dimensions of the Records Continuum Model and that the addition of a “shadow continuum” is unnecessary because the model can be applied even if records have not been made public. She proposes an alternative way of mapping the Migrated Archives onto the Records Continuum Model, which highlights important issues relating to the ownership of the archives and to the way they have been managed and used.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalArchival Science
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 21 Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Records Continuum Model
  • Migrated Archives
  • British colonial archives
  • Kenyan archives
  • Ownership of archives
  • Rights in records

Cite this

@article{d96c9d5aea6d498eb255f726b4d4b14c,
title = "The flexibility of the records continuum model: a response to Michael Karabinos' {"}in the shadow of the continuum{"}",
abstract = "In an article entitled “In the shadow of the continuum: testing the records continuum model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘Migrated Archives’” published in Archival Science in 2018, Michael Karabinos argued that the Records Continuum Model cannot be applied if the records under scrutiny have not been pluralised and that openness and accessibility are keys to the functionality of the model. He proposed a “shadow continuum” to analyse the Migrated Archives when its existence was unknown to the public. The author of this response believes that Karabinos’ analysis is based on a misunderstanding of the dimensions of the Records Continuum Model and that the addition of a “shadow continuum” is unnecessary because the model can be applied even if records have not been made public. She proposes an alternative way of mapping the Migrated Archives onto the Records Continuum Model, which highlights important issues relating to the ownership of the archives and to the way they have been managed and used.",
keywords = "Records Continuum Model, Migrated Archives, British colonial archives, Kenyan archives, Ownership of archives, Rights in records",
author = "Viviane Frings-Hessami",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s10502-019-09316-w",
language = "English",
journal = "Archival Science",
issn = "1389-0166",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",

}

The flexibility of the records continuum model : a response to Michael Karabinos' "in the shadow of the continuum". / Frings-Hessami, Viviane.

In: Archival Science, 21.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The flexibility of the records continuum model

T2 - a response to Michael Karabinos' "in the shadow of the continuum"

AU - Frings-Hessami, Viviane

PY - 2019/6/21

Y1 - 2019/6/21

N2 - In an article entitled “In the shadow of the continuum: testing the records continuum model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘Migrated Archives’” published in Archival Science in 2018, Michael Karabinos argued that the Records Continuum Model cannot be applied if the records under scrutiny have not been pluralised and that openness and accessibility are keys to the functionality of the model. He proposed a “shadow continuum” to analyse the Migrated Archives when its existence was unknown to the public. The author of this response believes that Karabinos’ analysis is based on a misunderstanding of the dimensions of the Records Continuum Model and that the addition of a “shadow continuum” is unnecessary because the model can be applied even if records have not been made public. She proposes an alternative way of mapping the Migrated Archives onto the Records Continuum Model, which highlights important issues relating to the ownership of the archives and to the way they have been managed and used.

AB - In an article entitled “In the shadow of the continuum: testing the records continuum model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘Migrated Archives’” published in Archival Science in 2018, Michael Karabinos argued that the Records Continuum Model cannot be applied if the records under scrutiny have not been pluralised and that openness and accessibility are keys to the functionality of the model. He proposed a “shadow continuum” to analyse the Migrated Archives when its existence was unknown to the public. The author of this response believes that Karabinos’ analysis is based on a misunderstanding of the dimensions of the Records Continuum Model and that the addition of a “shadow continuum” is unnecessary because the model can be applied even if records have not been made public. She proposes an alternative way of mapping the Migrated Archives onto the Records Continuum Model, which highlights important issues relating to the ownership of the archives and to the way they have been managed and used.

KW - Records Continuum Model

KW - Migrated Archives

KW - British colonial archives

KW - Kenyan archives

KW - Ownership of archives

KW - Rights in records

U2 - 10.1007/s10502-019-09316-w

DO - 10.1007/s10502-019-09316-w

M3 - Article

JO - Archival Science

JF - Archival Science

SN - 1389-0166

ER -