The fit between supply chain strategies and practices: a contingency approach and comparative analysis

Daniel Prajogo, Carlos Mena, Anand Nair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a contingency model that examines the external links between the business environment and supply chain strategies, and the internal links between supply chain strategies and supplier management practices. The research model theorizes that flexibility and low-cost oriented supply chain strategies should fit with the underlying business environments, and, in turn, supplier management practices (i.e., long-term relationships, supplier assessment, and integration) should fit with the chosen supply chain strategies. The dataset to test the research model was drawn from a survey of managers from 232 Australian manufacturing firms, and comparative path analyses were employed to assess the fit among different business environments, supply chain strategies, and supply chain practices. The findings show that dynamic environment has a better fit with flexibility strategy than low-cost strategy, while competitive environment surprisingly does not show a stronger fit to low-cost strategy than flexibility strategy. Additionally, the results show that while supplier assessment is important for both flexibility and low-cost oriented strategies, long-term relationship and logistics integration are more important for flexibility strategy than for low-cost strategy. The implications for theory and practice are discussed in the paper.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8071161
Pages (from-to)168-180
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Business environments
  • contingency theory
  • supplier management practices
  • supply chain strategies

Cite this

@article{85a131696a194309b0cf1034847fc85e,
title = "The fit between supply chain strategies and practices: a contingency approach and comparative analysis",
abstract = "This paper presents a contingency model that examines the external links between the business environment and supply chain strategies, and the internal links between supply chain strategies and supplier management practices. The research model theorizes that flexibility and low-cost oriented supply chain strategies should fit with the underlying business environments, and, in turn, supplier management practices (i.e., long-term relationships, supplier assessment, and integration) should fit with the chosen supply chain strategies. The dataset to test the research model was drawn from a survey of managers from 232 Australian manufacturing firms, and comparative path analyses were employed to assess the fit among different business environments, supply chain strategies, and supply chain practices. The findings show that dynamic environment has a better fit with flexibility strategy than low-cost strategy, while competitive environment surprisingly does not show a stronger fit to low-cost strategy than flexibility strategy. Additionally, the results show that while supplier assessment is important for both flexibility and low-cost oriented strategies, long-term relationship and logistics integration are more important for flexibility strategy than for low-cost strategy. The implications for theory and practice are discussed in the paper.",
keywords = "Business environments, contingency theory, supplier management practices, supply chain strategies",
author = "Daniel Prajogo and Carlos Mena and Anand Nair",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TEM.2017.2756982",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "168--180",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management",
issn = "0018-9391",
publisher = "IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",
number = "1",

}

The fit between supply chain strategies and practices : a contingency approach and comparative analysis. / Prajogo, Daniel; Mena, Carlos; Nair, Anand.

In: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 65, No. 1, 8071161, 01.02.2018, p. 168-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The fit between supply chain strategies and practices

T2 - a contingency approach and comparative analysis

AU - Prajogo, Daniel

AU - Mena, Carlos

AU - Nair, Anand

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - This paper presents a contingency model that examines the external links between the business environment and supply chain strategies, and the internal links between supply chain strategies and supplier management practices. The research model theorizes that flexibility and low-cost oriented supply chain strategies should fit with the underlying business environments, and, in turn, supplier management practices (i.e., long-term relationships, supplier assessment, and integration) should fit with the chosen supply chain strategies. The dataset to test the research model was drawn from a survey of managers from 232 Australian manufacturing firms, and comparative path analyses were employed to assess the fit among different business environments, supply chain strategies, and supply chain practices. The findings show that dynamic environment has a better fit with flexibility strategy than low-cost strategy, while competitive environment surprisingly does not show a stronger fit to low-cost strategy than flexibility strategy. Additionally, the results show that while supplier assessment is important for both flexibility and low-cost oriented strategies, long-term relationship and logistics integration are more important for flexibility strategy than for low-cost strategy. The implications for theory and practice are discussed in the paper.

AB - This paper presents a contingency model that examines the external links between the business environment and supply chain strategies, and the internal links between supply chain strategies and supplier management practices. The research model theorizes that flexibility and low-cost oriented supply chain strategies should fit with the underlying business environments, and, in turn, supplier management practices (i.e., long-term relationships, supplier assessment, and integration) should fit with the chosen supply chain strategies. The dataset to test the research model was drawn from a survey of managers from 232 Australian manufacturing firms, and comparative path analyses were employed to assess the fit among different business environments, supply chain strategies, and supply chain practices. The findings show that dynamic environment has a better fit with flexibility strategy than low-cost strategy, while competitive environment surprisingly does not show a stronger fit to low-cost strategy than flexibility strategy. Additionally, the results show that while supplier assessment is important for both flexibility and low-cost oriented strategies, long-term relationship and logistics integration are more important for flexibility strategy than for low-cost strategy. The implications for theory and practice are discussed in the paper.

KW - Business environments

KW - contingency theory

KW - supplier management practices

KW - supply chain strategies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032230093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TEM.2017.2756982

DO - 10.1109/TEM.2017.2756982

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032230093

VL - 65

SP - 168

EP - 180

JO - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

JF - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

SN - 0018-9391

IS - 1

M1 - 8071161

ER -