TY - JOUR
T1 - The feasibility of delivering first suspected seizure care using telehealth
T2 - A mixed methods controlled study
AU - Lewis, Annie K.
AU - Harding, Katherine E.
AU - Taylor, Nicholas F.
AU - O'Brien, Terence J.
AU - Carney, Patrick W.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Purpose: Prompt access to specialist assessment is critical after a first suspected seizure. We aimed to test the feasibility of providing this service via telehealth, compared with usual care (face-to-face appointment) in patients referred to a first seizure clinic. Method: This feasibility study was a prospective mixed-methods non-randomised controlled design in a single centre. Patients referred to the first seizure clinic chose to receive their consultation by telehealth (intervention group) or face-to-face (usual care). Demand, practicality, acceptability and limited-efficacy testing were assessed using recruitment and routinely collected clinic data, participant surveys and a clinician focus group. Results: Telehealth in the first seizure clinic was feasible; however, internet connection, computer hardware and software, patient confidence and organisational support impacted on practicality. Of patients who were eligible for telehealth, 25 % chose to use telehealth for their appointment, with more women taking up the opportunity. Geography and age were not factors in likelihood of uptake. There was no significant between-group difference found in acceptability and limited efficacy measures conducted. Conclusion: Telehealth is a responsive and convenient way to reach some patients who face barriers in access to specialist neurology assessment following a first suspected seizure.
AB - Purpose: Prompt access to specialist assessment is critical after a first suspected seizure. We aimed to test the feasibility of providing this service via telehealth, compared with usual care (face-to-face appointment) in patients referred to a first seizure clinic. Method: This feasibility study was a prospective mixed-methods non-randomised controlled design in a single centre. Patients referred to the first seizure clinic chose to receive their consultation by telehealth (intervention group) or face-to-face (usual care). Demand, practicality, acceptability and limited-efficacy testing were assessed using recruitment and routinely collected clinic data, participant surveys and a clinician focus group. Results: Telehealth in the first seizure clinic was feasible; however, internet connection, computer hardware and software, patient confidence and organisational support impacted on practicality. Of patients who were eligible for telehealth, 25 % chose to use telehealth for their appointment, with more women taking up the opportunity. Geography and age were not factors in likelihood of uptake. There was no significant between-group difference found in acceptability and limited efficacy measures conducted. Conclusion: Telehealth is a responsive and convenient way to reach some patients who face barriers in access to specialist neurology assessment following a first suspected seizure.
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Feasibility
KW - First seizure clinic
KW - Telehealth
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85097458074
U2 - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106520
DO - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106520
M3 - Article
C2 - 33302224
AN - SCOPUS:85097458074
SN - 0920-1211
VL - 169
JO - Epilepsy Research
JF - Epilepsy Research
M1 - 106520
ER -