TY - JOUR
T1 - The experiences of oppression among transgender and gender expansive young people in Australia
T2 - an interpretative phenomenological study
AU - Abela, Daniel
AU - Patlamazoglou, Lefteris
AU - Lea, Sophie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 NISC Pty Ltd.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Transgender and gender expansive (TGE) people experience poorer mental health outcomes compared to their cisgender counterparts. There is limited research on understanding the experiences of TGE school-aged young people from an Australian perspective. Since each country and state has different cultures, laws, and access to gender-affirming care research considering these differences is imperative. Methods: To address this gap, we used a qualitative design to explore the oppression of Australian TGE young people. Sixteen TGE participants (aged 14–17) completed individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Results: Three superordinate themes were identified: (1) oppression within the education system; (2) oppression within the medical and allied health system; and (3) oppression within the family system. The findings highlight the various settings and contexts of oppression young people encounter. We identified what must change for a more equitable society and advocate for the implementation of gender-affirming change. Discussion and conclusion: This study contributes to the dearth of TGE adolescents’s experiences and provides practical implications for society, especially in relation to the education, medical, and family systems. The implications include advocacy for more research in Australia and the inclusion of adolescents in policy reform. Limitations of this study and future directions are discussed.
AB - Background: Transgender and gender expansive (TGE) people experience poorer mental health outcomes compared to their cisgender counterparts. There is limited research on understanding the experiences of TGE school-aged young people from an Australian perspective. Since each country and state has different cultures, laws, and access to gender-affirming care research considering these differences is imperative. Methods: To address this gap, we used a qualitative design to explore the oppression of Australian TGE young people. Sixteen TGE participants (aged 14–17) completed individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Results: Three superordinate themes were identified: (1) oppression within the education system; (2) oppression within the medical and allied health system; and (3) oppression within the family system. The findings highlight the various settings and contexts of oppression young people encounter. We identified what must change for a more equitable society and advocate for the implementation of gender-affirming change. Discussion and conclusion: This study contributes to the dearth of TGE adolescents’s experiences and provides practical implications for society, especially in relation to the education, medical, and family systems. The implications include advocacy for more research in Australia and the inclusion of adolescents in policy reform. Limitations of this study and future directions are discussed.
KW - gender expansive
KW - oppression
KW - psychology
KW - transgender
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210440049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2989/17280583.2024.2393838
DO - 10.2989/17280583.2024.2393838
M3 - Article
C2 - 39558614
AN - SCOPUS:85210440049
SN - 1728-0583
JO - Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health
JF - Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health
ER -