Abstract
This paper compares the efficiency of using a standard direct-manipulation graphical user interface (GUI) with that of using the QuickSet pen/voice multimodal interface for supporting a military task. In this task, a user places military units and control measures (e.g., various types of lines, obstacles, objectives) on a map. Four military personnel designed and entered their own simulation scenarios via both interfaces. Analyses revealed that the multimodal interface led to a 3 to 4-fold speed improvement in the average entity creation time, including all error handling. Time to repair errors also was significantly faster when interacting multimodally. These results indicate a substantial efficiency advantage for multimodal over GUI-based interaction during map-based tasks.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | CHI'00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA'00 |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) |
Pages | 26-27 |
Number of pages | 2 |
ISBN (Print) | 1581132484, 9781581132489 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2000 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2000 - The Hague, Netherlands Duration: 1 Apr 2000 → 6 Apr 2000 Conference number: 18th |
Publication series
Name | Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings |
---|
Conference
Conference | International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2000 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | CHI 2000 |
Country/Territory | Netherlands |
City | The Hague |
Period | 1/04/00 → 6/04/00 |
Keywords
- Graphical user interface
- Multimodal interaction
- Spoken language