Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effects of psychological capital on accountants’ fraud reporting intentions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines whether and how psychological capital (PsyCap)—a positive psychological resource comprising hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism—shapes professional accountants' intentions to internally report fraud. Based on psychology resource theory, we examine whether PsyCap influences accountants' reporting intentions indirectly through three critical fraud-related judgements: the perceived seriousness of the misconduct, the felt personal responsibility to report, and the expected personal costs of doing so. We also propose that these effects will be conditional on the outcome of a previous whistleblowing experience. Using a quasi-experimental design, 177 professional accountants responded to a scenario involving the discovery of fraud within their firm. Our findings reveal that PsyCap indirectly shapes participants’ internal reporting intentions primarily through personal responsibility judgements. By highlighting the role of PsyCap, this research offers fresh insights for organizations, auditors, and scholars seeking to better understand whistleblowing, strengthen ethical reporting cultures, and reduce the organizational costs of fraud.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101893
Number of pages20
JournalThe British Accounting Review
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Fraud-related judgements
  • Personal costs
  • Personal responsibility
  • Psychological capital
  • Psychological resources
  • Seriousness
  • Whistleblowing

Cite this