The Effects of Forward Head Posture on Neck Extensor Muscle Thickness: An Ultrasonographic Study

Fereshte Goodarzi, Leila Rahnama, Noureddin Karimi, Raziyeh Baghi, Shapour Jaberzadeh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare neck extensor muscle thickness, thickness changes, and strength between participants with forward head posture (FHP) and controls with normal head posture (NHP). Methods: Twenty college students with FHP (mean age 21.30 ± 2.36 years) and 20 students with NHP (mean age 21.85 ± 2.78 years) participated in this case-control study. The thickness of neck extensor muscles was measured at rest and at maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). In addition, the craniovertebral angle (CVA) was calculated. To compare thickness changes between the 2 groups and among 5 muscles, a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance was applied. In addition, Pearson's correlation test was performed to investigate the relationship between neck extensor MVIC and CVA. Results: The FHP group demonstrated lower MVIC compared with the NHP group (P = .03). Semispinalis capitis showed the smallest thickness changes during neck extensor MVIC in FHP compared with the controls (P < .001). However, no significant difference in terms of muscle thickness was observed between the 2 groups at the state of rest (P = .16-.99). A positive association was also found between the MVIC and CVA (P = .02). Conclusions: Semispinalis capitis had less thickness changes during MVIC of neck extensors in individuals with FHP compared with those with NHP. This indirectly implies lower activity of this muscle in FHP condition. This study finding may help researchers develop therapeutic exercise protocols to manage FHP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-41
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Muscle Contraction
  • Muscle Strength
  • Neck Muscles
  • Posture
  • Ultrasonography

Cite this

Goodarzi, Fereshte ; Rahnama, Leila ; Karimi, Noureddin ; Baghi, Raziyeh ; Jaberzadeh, Shapour. / The Effects of Forward Head Posture on Neck Extensor Muscle Thickness : An Ultrasonographic Study. In: Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 34-41.
@article{d676a59cc4b146d19e787b8dbd0b5b77,
title = "The Effects of Forward Head Posture on Neck Extensor Muscle Thickness: An Ultrasonographic Study",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to compare neck extensor muscle thickness, thickness changes, and strength between participants with forward head posture (FHP) and controls with normal head posture (NHP). Methods: Twenty college students with FHP (mean age 21.30 ± 2.36 years) and 20 students with NHP (mean age 21.85 ± 2.78 years) participated in this case-control study. The thickness of neck extensor muscles was measured at rest and at maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). In addition, the craniovertebral angle (CVA) was calculated. To compare thickness changes between the 2 groups and among 5 muscles, a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance was applied. In addition, Pearson's correlation test was performed to investigate the relationship between neck extensor MVIC and CVA. Results: The FHP group demonstrated lower MVIC compared with the NHP group (P = .03). Semispinalis capitis showed the smallest thickness changes during neck extensor MVIC in FHP compared with the controls (P < .001). However, no significant difference in terms of muscle thickness was observed between the 2 groups at the state of rest (P = .16-.99). A positive association was also found between the MVIC and CVA (P = .02). Conclusions: Semispinalis capitis had less thickness changes during MVIC of neck extensors in individuals with FHP compared with those with NHP. This indirectly implies lower activity of this muscle in FHP condition. This study finding may help researchers develop therapeutic exercise protocols to manage FHP.",
keywords = "Muscle Contraction, Muscle Strength, Neck Muscles, Posture, Ultrasonography",
author = "Fereshte Goodarzi and Leila Rahnama and Noureddin Karimi and Raziyeh Baghi and Shapour Jaberzadeh",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.07.012",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "34--41",
journal = "Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics",
issn = "0161-4754",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

The Effects of Forward Head Posture on Neck Extensor Muscle Thickness : An Ultrasonographic Study. / Goodarzi, Fereshte; Rahnama, Leila; Karimi, Noureddin; Baghi, Raziyeh; Jaberzadeh, Shapour.

In: Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 34-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Forward Head Posture on Neck Extensor Muscle Thickness

T2 - An Ultrasonographic Study

AU - Goodarzi, Fereshte

AU - Rahnama, Leila

AU - Karimi, Noureddin

AU - Baghi, Raziyeh

AU - Jaberzadeh, Shapour

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to compare neck extensor muscle thickness, thickness changes, and strength between participants with forward head posture (FHP) and controls with normal head posture (NHP). Methods: Twenty college students with FHP (mean age 21.30 ± 2.36 years) and 20 students with NHP (mean age 21.85 ± 2.78 years) participated in this case-control study. The thickness of neck extensor muscles was measured at rest and at maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). In addition, the craniovertebral angle (CVA) was calculated. To compare thickness changes between the 2 groups and among 5 muscles, a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance was applied. In addition, Pearson's correlation test was performed to investigate the relationship between neck extensor MVIC and CVA. Results: The FHP group demonstrated lower MVIC compared with the NHP group (P = .03). Semispinalis capitis showed the smallest thickness changes during neck extensor MVIC in FHP compared with the controls (P < .001). However, no significant difference in terms of muscle thickness was observed between the 2 groups at the state of rest (P = .16-.99). A positive association was also found between the MVIC and CVA (P = .02). Conclusions: Semispinalis capitis had less thickness changes during MVIC of neck extensors in individuals with FHP compared with those with NHP. This indirectly implies lower activity of this muscle in FHP condition. This study finding may help researchers develop therapeutic exercise protocols to manage FHP.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to compare neck extensor muscle thickness, thickness changes, and strength between participants with forward head posture (FHP) and controls with normal head posture (NHP). Methods: Twenty college students with FHP (mean age 21.30 ± 2.36 years) and 20 students with NHP (mean age 21.85 ± 2.78 years) participated in this case-control study. The thickness of neck extensor muscles was measured at rest and at maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). In addition, the craniovertebral angle (CVA) was calculated. To compare thickness changes between the 2 groups and among 5 muscles, a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance was applied. In addition, Pearson's correlation test was performed to investigate the relationship between neck extensor MVIC and CVA. Results: The FHP group demonstrated lower MVIC compared with the NHP group (P = .03). Semispinalis capitis showed the smallest thickness changes during neck extensor MVIC in FHP compared with the controls (P < .001). However, no significant difference in terms of muscle thickness was observed between the 2 groups at the state of rest (P = .16-.99). A positive association was also found between the MVIC and CVA (P = .02). Conclusions: Semispinalis capitis had less thickness changes during MVIC of neck extensors in individuals with FHP compared with those with NHP. This indirectly implies lower activity of this muscle in FHP condition. This study finding may help researchers develop therapeutic exercise protocols to manage FHP.

KW - Muscle Contraction

KW - Muscle Strength

KW - Neck Muscles

KW - Posture

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039068857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.07.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85039068857

VL - 41

SP - 34

EP - 41

JO - Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

JF - Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

SN - 0161-4754

IS - 1

ER -