Abstract
Objective To determine the effect of primary midwife-led care ('caseload midwifery') on women's experiences of childbirth. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Tertiary care women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Population A total of 2314 low-risk pregnant women. Methods Women randomised to caseload care received antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a primary midwife, with some care provided by a 'back-up' midwife. Women in standard care received midwifery-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care or community-based medical care. Main outcome measures The primary outcome of the study was caesarean section. This paper presents a secondary outcome, women's experience of childbirth. Women's views and experiences were sought using seven-point rating scales via postal questionnaires 2 months after the birth. Results A total of 2314 women were randomised between September 2007 and June 2010; 1156 to caseload and 1158 to standard care. Response rates to the follow-up questionnaire were 88 and 74%, respectively. Women in the caseload group were more positive about their overall birth experience than women in the standard care group (adjusted odds ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.22-1.84). They also felt more in control during labour, were more proud of themselves, less anxious, and more likely to have a positive experience of pain. Conclusions Compared with standard maternity care, caseload midwifery may improve women's experiences of childbirth.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 465-474 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
| Volume | 123 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Birth experience
- caseload midwifery
- continuity of care
- midwife-led care
- primary midwife care
- randomised controlled trial
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver