TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of calcium channel blockers on digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis
T2 - data from a prospective cohort study
AU - Ross, Laura
AU - Hansen, Dylan
AU - Maltez, Nancy
AU - Morrisroe, Kathleen
AU - Kumar, Kimti
AU - Walker, Jennifer
AU - Stevens, Wendy
AU - Sahhar, Joanne
AU - Ngian, Gene Siew
AU - Host, Lauren
AU - Nikpour, Mandana
AU - Proudman, Susanna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Digital ulcers (DU) are a common, severe vascular manifestation of systemic sclerosis (SSc) with few effective treatment options. Using data from the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS), we sought to evaluate the effect of calcium channel blockers (CCB) on the treatment and prevention of DU. Using data from 1953 participants, with a median of 4.34 years of follow-up, we used generalised estimating equations to evaluate the clinical characteristics associated with CCB use and ascertain the risk factors for the presence of DU at subsequent study visits. A time-dependent Cox-proportional hazard model was applied to evaluate the risk of future occurrence of DU with CCB use. Sixty-six percent of participants received CCB and patients with a history of DU were more likely to be prescribed a CCB (76.76% vs 53.70%, p < 0.01). CCB use was more frequent in patients with severe complications of DU including chronic DU (OR 1.47, p = 0.02), need for hospitalisation for iloprost (OR 1.30, p = 0.01) or antibiotics (OR 1.36, p = 0.04) and digital amputation (OR 1.48, p < 0.01). Use of CCB was more likely in patients who experienced DU at subsequent study visits (OR 1.32, p < 0.01) and was not associated with a decreased risk of the development of a first DU (HR 0.94, p = 0.65). CCB are frequently used in the management of SSc in the ASCS and their use is associated with severe peripheral vascular manifestations of SSc. However, our results suggest that CCB may not be effective in the healing or prevention of DU.
AB - Digital ulcers (DU) are a common, severe vascular manifestation of systemic sclerosis (SSc) with few effective treatment options. Using data from the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS), we sought to evaluate the effect of calcium channel blockers (CCB) on the treatment and prevention of DU. Using data from 1953 participants, with a median of 4.34 years of follow-up, we used generalised estimating equations to evaluate the clinical characteristics associated with CCB use and ascertain the risk factors for the presence of DU at subsequent study visits. A time-dependent Cox-proportional hazard model was applied to evaluate the risk of future occurrence of DU with CCB use. Sixty-six percent of participants received CCB and patients with a history of DU were more likely to be prescribed a CCB (76.76% vs 53.70%, p < 0.01). CCB use was more frequent in patients with severe complications of DU including chronic DU (OR 1.47, p = 0.02), need for hospitalisation for iloprost (OR 1.30, p = 0.01) or antibiotics (OR 1.36, p = 0.04) and digital amputation (OR 1.48, p < 0.01). Use of CCB was more likely in patients who experienced DU at subsequent study visits (OR 1.32, p < 0.01) and was not associated with a decreased risk of the development of a first DU (HR 0.94, p = 0.65). CCB are frequently used in the management of SSc in the ASCS and their use is associated with severe peripheral vascular manifestations of SSc. However, our results suggest that CCB may not be effective in the healing or prevention of DU.
KW - Calcium channel blockers
KW - Digital ulcers
KW - Prevention
KW - Systemic sclerosis
KW - Treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85175614929
U2 - 10.1007/s10067-023-06796-1
DO - 10.1007/s10067-023-06796-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 37921914
AN - SCOPUS:85175614929
SN - 0770-3198
VL - 43
SP - 269
EP - 276
JO - Clinical Rheumatology
JF - Clinical Rheumatology
ER -