Abstract
Imaging research regularly yields incidental findings that may have personal medical or reproductive decision-making significance to study participants. It is widely assumed that researchers have a moral obligation to disclose at least some kinds of incidental findings to research participants. However, it is also a widely held view that researchers do not have a moral obligation to actively look for abnormalities irrelevant to the aims of their study. This paper challenges that assumption.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2-12 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Ethics & Human Research |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- human subjects research
- imaging research
- incidental findings
- return of research results