The Dual Patronage Roles of Literary Censorship

On English Translations of the Erotic Texts in Jin Ping Mei

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Lefevere defines patronage as a force that may promote or hinder the reading, creation and rewriting of works, with a highlight that patronage is mostly a promoting rather than hindering force. As such, researchers on patronage of persons and institutions have predominantly focused on the former with a practical exclusion of the latter. This article, by putting the English translations of the sexual descriptions in Jin Ping Mei under scrutiny, attempts to tease out literary censorship’s dual patronage function of both hindering and promoting the production, publication, circulation and reception of the relevant texts. Despite the seeming ambivalence, the concurrence of the two opposite functions in the same patron actually reveals the hierarchical, dynamic and interactive nature of the patronage system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-116
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Translation Studies
Volume2
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • literary censorship
  • patronage
  • Jin Ping Mei
  • sexual descriptions

Cite this

@article{0275f0ecbdce47e49d9d1fe5d396b741,
title = "The Dual Patronage Roles of Literary Censorship: On English Translations of the Erotic Texts in Jin Ping Mei",
abstract = "Lefevere defines patronage as a force that may promote or hinder the reading, creation and rewriting of works, with a highlight that patronage is mostly a promoting rather than hindering force. As such, researchers on patronage of persons and institutions have predominantly focused on the former with a practical exclusion of the latter. This article, by putting the English translations of the sexual descriptions in Jin Ping Mei under scrutiny, attempts to tease out literary censorship’s dual patronage function of both hindering and promoting the production, publication, circulation and reception of the relevant texts. Despite the seeming ambivalence, the concurrence of the two opposite functions in the same patron actually reveals the hierarchical, dynamic and interactive nature of the patronage system.",
keywords = "literary censorship, patronage, Jin Ping Mei, sexual descriptions",
author = "Lintao Qi",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "101--116",
journal = "Journal of Translation Studies",
issn = "1027-7978",
publisher = "Chinese University Press",
number = "2",

}

The Dual Patronage Roles of Literary Censorship : On English Translations of the Erotic Texts in Jin Ping Mei. / Qi, Lintao.

In: Journal of Translation Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2018, p. 101-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Dual Patronage Roles of Literary Censorship

T2 - On English Translations of the Erotic Texts in Jin Ping Mei

AU - Qi, Lintao

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Lefevere defines patronage as a force that may promote or hinder the reading, creation and rewriting of works, with a highlight that patronage is mostly a promoting rather than hindering force. As such, researchers on patronage of persons and institutions have predominantly focused on the former with a practical exclusion of the latter. This article, by putting the English translations of the sexual descriptions in Jin Ping Mei under scrutiny, attempts to tease out literary censorship’s dual patronage function of both hindering and promoting the production, publication, circulation and reception of the relevant texts. Despite the seeming ambivalence, the concurrence of the two opposite functions in the same patron actually reveals the hierarchical, dynamic and interactive nature of the patronage system.

AB - Lefevere defines patronage as a force that may promote or hinder the reading, creation and rewriting of works, with a highlight that patronage is mostly a promoting rather than hindering force. As such, researchers on patronage of persons and institutions have predominantly focused on the former with a practical exclusion of the latter. This article, by putting the English translations of the sexual descriptions in Jin Ping Mei under scrutiny, attempts to tease out literary censorship’s dual patronage function of both hindering and promoting the production, publication, circulation and reception of the relevant texts. Despite the seeming ambivalence, the concurrence of the two opposite functions in the same patron actually reveals the hierarchical, dynamic and interactive nature of the patronage system.

KW - literary censorship

KW - patronage

KW - Jin Ping Mei

KW - sexual descriptions

UR - http://www.chineseupress.com/chinesepress/journal/JTS2018_2.2/JTS2.2_101-116.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 101

EP - 116

JO - Journal of Translation Studies

JF - Journal of Translation Studies

SN - 1027-7978

IS - 2

ER -