The dividend substitution hypothesis: Australian evidence

Christine Ann Brown, John C Handley, James William O'Day

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In a perfect capital market firms are indifferent to either dividends or repurchases as payout mechanisms, suggesting that the two payout methods should be perfect substitutes. Empirical research at the single country level, as well as cross country studies, provide evidence that dividends and repurchases act as substitutes (the dividend substitution hypothesis), and that the tax treatment of dividends versus capital gains affects this relation. Australia, which operates under a full dividend imputation system, has two types of repurchases: on- and off-market. On-market repurchases are taxed as capital gains while off-market repurchases comprise a large dividend component carrying valuable tax credits. Australia thus provides a natural setting to investigate how the tax treatment of proceeds affects the dividend substitution hypothesis. Dividend substitution is found to exist for on-market repurchases but not for off-market repurchases, thus providing further support for the idea that the tax treatment of proceeds affects the substitutability of repurchases and dividends.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)37 - 62
    Number of pages26
    JournalAbacus
    Volume51
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Cite this

    Brown, Christine Ann ; Handley, John C ; O'Day, James William. / The dividend substitution hypothesis: Australian evidence. In: Abacus. 2015 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 37 - 62.
    @article{737444dd69a44701849ee572c3b89cd1,
    title = "The dividend substitution hypothesis: Australian evidence",
    abstract = "In a perfect capital market firms are indifferent to either dividends or repurchases as payout mechanisms, suggesting that the two payout methods should be perfect substitutes. Empirical research at the single country level, as well as cross country studies, provide evidence that dividends and repurchases act as substitutes (the dividend substitution hypothesis), and that the tax treatment of dividends versus capital gains affects this relation. Australia, which operates under a full dividend imputation system, has two types of repurchases: on- and off-market. On-market repurchases are taxed as capital gains while off-market repurchases comprise a large dividend component carrying valuable tax credits. Australia thus provides a natural setting to investigate how the tax treatment of proceeds affects the dividend substitution hypothesis. Dividend substitution is found to exist for on-market repurchases but not for off-market repurchases, thus providing further support for the idea that the tax treatment of proceeds affects the substitutability of repurchases and dividends.",
    author = "Brown, {Christine Ann} and Handley, {John C} and O'Day, {James William}",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1111/abac.12041",
    language = "English",
    volume = "51",
    pages = "37 -- 62",
    journal = "Abacus",
    issn = "0001-3072",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    The dividend substitution hypothesis: Australian evidence. / Brown, Christine Ann; Handley, John C; O'Day, James William.

    In: Abacus, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2015, p. 37 - 62.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The dividend substitution hypothesis: Australian evidence

    AU - Brown, Christine Ann

    AU - Handley, John C

    AU - O'Day, James William

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - In a perfect capital market firms are indifferent to either dividends or repurchases as payout mechanisms, suggesting that the two payout methods should be perfect substitutes. Empirical research at the single country level, as well as cross country studies, provide evidence that dividends and repurchases act as substitutes (the dividend substitution hypothesis), and that the tax treatment of dividends versus capital gains affects this relation. Australia, which operates under a full dividend imputation system, has two types of repurchases: on- and off-market. On-market repurchases are taxed as capital gains while off-market repurchases comprise a large dividend component carrying valuable tax credits. Australia thus provides a natural setting to investigate how the tax treatment of proceeds affects the dividend substitution hypothesis. Dividend substitution is found to exist for on-market repurchases but not for off-market repurchases, thus providing further support for the idea that the tax treatment of proceeds affects the substitutability of repurchases and dividends.

    AB - In a perfect capital market firms are indifferent to either dividends or repurchases as payout mechanisms, suggesting that the two payout methods should be perfect substitutes. Empirical research at the single country level, as well as cross country studies, provide evidence that dividends and repurchases act as substitutes (the dividend substitution hypothesis), and that the tax treatment of dividends versus capital gains affects this relation. Australia, which operates under a full dividend imputation system, has two types of repurchases: on- and off-market. On-market repurchases are taxed as capital gains while off-market repurchases comprise a large dividend component carrying valuable tax credits. Australia thus provides a natural setting to investigate how the tax treatment of proceeds affects the dividend substitution hypothesis. Dividend substitution is found to exist for on-market repurchases but not for off-market repurchases, thus providing further support for the idea that the tax treatment of proceeds affects the substitutability of repurchases and dividends.

    U2 - 10.1111/abac.12041

    DO - 10.1111/abac.12041

    M3 - Article

    VL - 51

    SP - 37

    EP - 62

    JO - Abacus

    JF - Abacus

    SN - 0001-3072

    IS - 1

    ER -