Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The dilemma of distance: Patients with kidney cancer from regional Australia present at a more advanced stage

  • Prassannah Satasivam
  • , Sarah O'Neill
  • , Gausihi Sivarajah
  • , Ania Sliwinski
  • , Celina Kaiser
  • , Owen Niall
  • , Jeremy Goad
  • , Janelle Brennan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective To determine whether patients from regional areas undergoing surgery for kidney cancer present with more advanced disease as a result of geographic isolation. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of 221 patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from January 2004 to June 2012, from both a metropolitan centre and a large inner regional hospital. Data was collected on age, gender, presentation (incidental or symptomatic), clinical stage and pathological features. The Australian Standard Geographical Classification-Remoteness Area (ASGC-RA) is a system developed to allow quantitative comparisons between metropolitan and rural Australia. A score was assigned to each patient based on their location of residence at the time of surgery: metropolitan, RA1; inner regional, RA2; outer regional, RA3. Statistical significance was specified as P < 0.05 on Pearson's chi-square tests. Results Patients in each ASGC-RA group did not differ significantly in age, sex or mode of presentation. Pathological T stage on presentation increased with increasing ASGC-RA and thus distance from tertiary centres (P = 0.004). The proportion of patients with ≥T3 disease rose from 30% of RA1 to 73% of RA3 patients (P = 0.016) treated at our tertiary centre. Similarly, our regional centre had a larger proportion of patients presenting with ≥T3 disease from RA3 (31% vs 5%, P = 0.003). When the 221 patients with RCC were analysed as a group, clinical T stage was significantly associated with ASGC-RA (P < 0.001), symptomatic presentation (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001),M stage (P < 0.001) and Fuhrman grade (P < 0.001). Conclusions Our data quantifies the detrimental effect of physical distance on the health outcomes of regional Australians with kidney cancer. Australia's unique geography and rural culture may preclude any attempts to centralise cancer care to specialised metropolitan units, as has occurred in other countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-63
Number of pages7
JournalBJU International
Volume113
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Kidney cancer
  • Rural health

Cite this