The Association Between Time Taken to Report, Lodge, and Start Wage Replacement and Return-to-Work Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: The aim of the study was to determine if prolonged times taken to notify, file, adjudicate, and start wage replacement for workers' compensation claims are associated with poorer return-to-work (RTW) outcomes. Methods: Using 71,607 claims lodged 2007 to 2012, logistic regression determined associations between time to claim filing, adjudication, and payment and (1) socio-demographic/economic, occupational, and injury-related factors; and (2) 52 weeks of wage replacement (WR). Results: Prolonged times for all processing steps were associated with increased odds of reaching 52 weeks of WR. Prolonged times in more than one step increased the odds of a long-term claim. Being female was the only variable consistently associated with each prolonged processing time. Conclusions: The predictive ability of prolonged times in claim lodgement and processing and compensation payments demonstrate that shorter claims management and adjudication times could improve RTW outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)622-630
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018


  • compensable injury
  • delays
  • long-term injured workers
  • wage replacement
  • workplace

Cite this