The ancestry of the Australian prime ministership: 'the blue ribbon of the highest possible ambition'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

More than a century after the birth of the Commonwealth of Australia, the office of prime minister is the apex of the nation s political life. Yet little has been written about the antecedence and evolution of the office of prime minister. This article takes a step towards redressing this neglect by considering how the Westminster-derived model of the prime ministership was conditioned by the nature and form of executive office in the Australian colonies in the second half of the nineteenth century. The experience of the colonial legislatures predisposed against fears of an overweening executive. The constitutional Conventions of the 1890s were dominated by seasoned colonial politicians with benign attitudes towards executive authority. Yet as delegates grappled with the challenge of marrying responsible government to a federal system, the form of executive was debated rather than treated as fait accompli. These deliberations hinted at their expectations for the prime ministership in a federated Australia: the office would be the most powerful and greatest political prize in the new nation. The article concludes by suggesting that the first Commonwealth decade was a transitional period for the prime ministership (with pre-Federation patterns still evident) and identifying the Fisher Government of 1910-13 as heralding a shift to a more modern form of (party-based) executive governance. (c) 2015 The Author.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19 - 36
Number of pages18
JournalAustralian Journal of Politics and History
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{e61c2be05dff4c63ad13c9e72decf936,
title = "The ancestry of the Australian prime ministership: 'the blue ribbon of the highest possible ambition'",
abstract = "More than a century after the birth of the Commonwealth of Australia, the office of prime minister is the apex of the nation s political life. Yet little has been written about the antecedence and evolution of the office of prime minister. This article takes a step towards redressing this neglect by considering how the Westminster-derived model of the prime ministership was conditioned by the nature and form of executive office in the Australian colonies in the second half of the nineteenth century. The experience of the colonial legislatures predisposed against fears of an overweening executive. The constitutional Conventions of the 1890s were dominated by seasoned colonial politicians with benign attitudes towards executive authority. Yet as delegates grappled with the challenge of marrying responsible government to a federal system, the form of executive was debated rather than treated as fait accompli. These deliberations hinted at their expectations for the prime ministership in a federated Australia: the office would be the most powerful and greatest political prize in the new nation. The article concludes by suggesting that the first Commonwealth decade was a transitional period for the prime ministership (with pre-Federation patterns still evident) and identifying the Fisher Government of 1910-13 as heralding a shift to a more modern form of (party-based) executive governance. (c) 2015 The Author.",
author = "Strangio, {Paul Adrian}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/ajph.12084",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "19 -- 36",
journal = "Australian Journal of Politics and History",
issn = "0004-9522",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

The ancestry of the Australian prime ministership: 'the blue ribbon of the highest possible ambition'. / Strangio, Paul Adrian.

In: Australian Journal of Politics and History, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2015, p. 19 - 36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ancestry of the Australian prime ministership: 'the blue ribbon of the highest possible ambition'

AU - Strangio, Paul Adrian

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - More than a century after the birth of the Commonwealth of Australia, the office of prime minister is the apex of the nation s political life. Yet little has been written about the antecedence and evolution of the office of prime minister. This article takes a step towards redressing this neglect by considering how the Westminster-derived model of the prime ministership was conditioned by the nature and form of executive office in the Australian colonies in the second half of the nineteenth century. The experience of the colonial legislatures predisposed against fears of an overweening executive. The constitutional Conventions of the 1890s were dominated by seasoned colonial politicians with benign attitudes towards executive authority. Yet as delegates grappled with the challenge of marrying responsible government to a federal system, the form of executive was debated rather than treated as fait accompli. These deliberations hinted at their expectations for the prime ministership in a federated Australia: the office would be the most powerful and greatest political prize in the new nation. The article concludes by suggesting that the first Commonwealth decade was a transitional period for the prime ministership (with pre-Federation patterns still evident) and identifying the Fisher Government of 1910-13 as heralding a shift to a more modern form of (party-based) executive governance. (c) 2015 The Author.

AB - More than a century after the birth of the Commonwealth of Australia, the office of prime minister is the apex of the nation s political life. Yet little has been written about the antecedence and evolution of the office of prime minister. This article takes a step towards redressing this neglect by considering how the Westminster-derived model of the prime ministership was conditioned by the nature and form of executive office in the Australian colonies in the second half of the nineteenth century. The experience of the colonial legislatures predisposed against fears of an overweening executive. The constitutional Conventions of the 1890s were dominated by seasoned colonial politicians with benign attitudes towards executive authority. Yet as delegates grappled with the challenge of marrying responsible government to a federal system, the form of executive was debated rather than treated as fait accompli. These deliberations hinted at their expectations for the prime ministership in a federated Australia: the office would be the most powerful and greatest political prize in the new nation. The article concludes by suggesting that the first Commonwealth decade was a transitional period for the prime ministership (with pre-Federation patterns still evident) and identifying the Fisher Government of 1910-13 as heralding a shift to a more modern form of (party-based) executive governance. (c) 2015 The Author.

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajph.12084/pdf

U2 - 10.1111/ajph.12084

DO - 10.1111/ajph.12084

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 19

EP - 36

JO - Australian Journal of Politics and History

JF - Australian Journal of Politics and History

SN - 0004-9522

IS - 1

ER -