TY - JOUR
T1 - The all-age spirometry reference ranges reflect contemporary Australasian spirometry
AU - Thompson, Bruce
AU - Stanojevic, Sanja
AU - Abramson, Michael
AU - Beasley, Richard
AU - Coates, Andrew
AU - Dent, Annette
AU - Eckert, Brenton
AU - James, Alan
AU - Filsell, Sue
AU - Musk, A
AU - Nolan, Gary
AU - Dixon, Barbara
AU - O'Dea, Chris
AU - Savage, Jenni
AU - Stocks, Janet
AU - Swanney, Maureen
AU - Hall, Graham
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Background and objective: Advances in statistical
modelling have allowed the creation of smoothly
changing spirometry reference ranges that apply
across a wide age range and better define the lower
limit of normal.The objective of this study was to assess
the agreement of the Stanojevic 2009 all-age reference
ranges to contemporary lung function data to verify
the appropriateness of this reference for clinical use in
Australia and New Zealand.
Methods: Spirometry data from healthy Caucasians
measured between 2000a??2009 in Australia and New
Zealand were collected. Z-scores were calculated for
the standard spirometry outcomes based on the all-age
reference ranges.
Results: Spirometry from 2066 subjects aged
4a??80 years (55 male) from 14 centres were eligible.
Statistically, the collated contemporary dataset differed
from the all-age reference ranges, but these differences
were relatively small and clinically irrelevant
representing differences of approximately 3 predicted.
Significant differences were also observed
between some centres and equipment, potentially
indicating varying influence of equipment or subject
selection.
Conclusions: Spirometry from contemporary Australasian
healthy subjects fits the all-age reference
rangeswell.While the current study supports the use of
the all-age reference ranges, the between-centre differences
highlight the need for spirometry to be used in
conjunction with other clinical findings.
AB - Background and objective: Advances in statistical
modelling have allowed the creation of smoothly
changing spirometry reference ranges that apply
across a wide age range and better define the lower
limit of normal.The objective of this study was to assess
the agreement of the Stanojevic 2009 all-age reference
ranges to contemporary lung function data to verify
the appropriateness of this reference for clinical use in
Australia and New Zealand.
Methods: Spirometry data from healthy Caucasians
measured between 2000a??2009 in Australia and New
Zealand were collected. Z-scores were calculated for
the standard spirometry outcomes based on the all-age
reference ranges.
Results: Spirometry from 2066 subjects aged
4a??80 years (55 male) from 14 centres were eligible.
Statistically, the collated contemporary dataset differed
from the all-age reference ranges, but these differences
were relatively small and clinically irrelevant
representing differences of approximately 3 predicted.
Significant differences were also observed
between some centres and equipment, potentially
indicating varying influence of equipment or subject
selection.
Conclusions: Spirometry from contemporary Australasian
healthy subjects fits the all-age reference
rangeswell.While the current study supports the use of
the all-age reference ranges, the between-centre differences
highlight the need for spirometry to be used in
conjunction with other clinical findings.
UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01970.x/pdf
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79959868494
U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01970.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01970.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1323-7799
VL - 16
SP - 912
EP - 917
JO - Respirology
JF - Respirology
IS - 6
ER -