Abstract
Background and objective: Advances in statistical
modelling have allowed the creation of smoothly
changing spirometry reference ranges that apply
across a wide age range and better define the lower
limit of normal.The objective of this study was to assess
the agreement of the Stanojevic 2009 all-age reference
ranges to contemporary lung function data to verify
the appropriateness of this reference for clinical use in
Australia and New Zealand.
Methods: Spirometry data from healthy Caucasians
measured between 2000a??2009 in Australia and New
Zealand were collected. Z-scores were calculated for
the standard spirometry outcomes based on the all-age
reference ranges.
Results: Spirometry from 2066 subjects aged
4a??80 years (55 male) from 14 centres were eligible.
Statistically, the collated contemporary dataset differed
from the all-age reference ranges, but these differences
were relatively small and clinically irrelevant
representing differences of approximately 3 predicted.
Significant differences were also observed
between some centres and equipment, potentially
indicating varying influence of equipment or subject
selection.
Conclusions: Spirometry from contemporary Australasian
healthy subjects fits the all-age reference
rangeswell.While the current study supports the use of
the all-age reference ranges, the between-centre differences
highlight the need for spirometry to be used in
conjunction with other clinical findings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 912 - 917 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Respirology |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |