The all-age spirometry reference ranges reflect contemporary Australasian spirometry

Bruce Thompson, Sanja Stanojevic, Michael Abramson, Richard Beasley, Andrew Coates, Annette Dent, Brenton Eckert, Alan James, Sue Filsell, A Musk, Gary Nolan, Barbara Dixon, Chris O'Dea, Jenni Savage, Janet Stocks, Maureen Swanney, Graham Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objective: Advances in statistical modelling have allowed the creation of smoothly changing spirometry reference ranges that apply across a wide age range and better define the lower limit of normal.The objective of this study was to assess the agreement of the Stanojevic 2009 all-age reference ranges to contemporary lung function data to verify the appropriateness of this reference for clinical use in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Spirometry data from healthy Caucasians measured between 2000a??2009 in Australia and New Zealand were collected. Z-scores were calculated for the standard spirometry outcomes based on the all-age reference ranges. Results: Spirometry from 2066 subjects aged 4a??80 years (55 male) from 14 centres were eligible. Statistically, the collated contemporary dataset differed from the all-age reference ranges, but these differences were relatively small and clinically irrelevant representing differences of approximately 3 predicted. Significant differences were also observed between some centres and equipment, potentially indicating varying influence of equipment or subject selection. Conclusions: Spirometry from contemporary Australasian healthy subjects fits the all-age reference rangeswell.While the current study supports the use of the all-age reference ranges, the between-centre differences highlight the need for spirometry to be used in conjunction with other clinical findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)912 - 917
Number of pages6
JournalRespirology
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this