The ACTA PORT-score for predicting perioperative risk of blood transfusion for adult cardiac surgery

A. A. Klein, T. Collier, J. Yeates, L. F. Miles, S. N. Fletcher, C. Evans, T. Richards, on behalf of the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)


Background. A simple and accurate scoring system to predict risk of transfusion for patients undergoing cardiac surgery is lacking. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected from the ACTA National Audit. For the derivation dataset, we included data from 20 036 patients, which we then externally validated using a further group of 1047 patients. Methods. We identified independent risk factors associated with transfusion by performing univariate analysis, followed by logistic regression. We then simplified the score to an integer-based system and tested it using the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUC) statistic with a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Finally, the scoring system was applied to the external validation dataset and the same statistical methods applied to test the accuracy of the ACTA-PORT score. Results. Several factors were independently associated with risk of transfusion, including age, sex, body surface area, logistic EuroSCORE, preoperative haemoglobin and creatinine, and type of surgery. In our primary dataset, the score accurately predicted risk of perioperative transfusion in cardiac surgery patients with an AUC of 0.76. The external validation confirmed accuracy of the scoring method with an AUC of 0.84 and good agreement across all scores, with a minor tendency to under-estimate transfusion risk in very high-risk patients. Conclusions. The ACTA-PORT score is a reliable, validated tool for predicting risk of transfusion for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This and other scores can be used in research studies for risk adjustment when assessing outcomes, and might also be incorporated into a Patient Blood Management programme.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)394-401
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2017
Externally publishedYes


  • anaesthesia
  • cardiovascular
  • risk prediction
  • transfusion

Cite this