Tekstuele kenmerken van misleidende journalistiek

De zaak-Ramesar

Translated title of the contribution: Textual characteristics of deceptive journalism: the Ramesar case

Charlotte Govaert, Luuk Lagerwerf, Celine Klemm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Trustworthiness is key in journalism, yet some journalists intentionally deceive their audiences by fabricating sources. In 2014, Dutch journalist Perdiep Ramesar was fired from Trouw, an esteemed national newspaper in the Netherlands, after it was discovered that sources in 126 of his articles were ‘non-verifiable’. This poses the question whether untrustworthy news articles may be recognized, for instance by textual characteristics. Using corpus analysis, we searched for systematic differences in source use and presentation comparing Ramesar’s deceptive news articles with two same-sized sets of reliable articles, 1) articles on similar topics from other journalists, and 2) articles with verifiable sources from Ramesar himself. Results indicate that compared to real news sources, fictitious sources are more often secondary definers, who are presented in more stereotypical ways and through more and longer direct quotations.
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)61-74
Number of pages14
JournalTijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Journalism ethics
  • Linguistic analysis
  • Content analysis
  • Fraud detection

Cite this

Govaert, Charlotte ; Lagerwerf, Luuk ; Klemm, Celine. / Tekstuele kenmerken van misleidende journalistiek : De zaak-Ramesar. In: Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing. 2019 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 61-74.
@article{993437f6bd4747bdbc92627b5de74e4d,
title = "Tekstuele kenmerken van misleidende journalistiek: De zaak-Ramesar",
abstract = "Trustworthiness is key in journalism, yet some journalists intentionally deceive their audiences by fabricating sources. In 2014, Dutch journalist Perdiep Ramesar was fired from Trouw, an esteemed national newspaper in the Netherlands, after it was discovered that sources in 126 of his articles were ‘non-verifiable’. This poses the question whether untrustworthy news articles may be recognized, for instance by textual characteristics. Using corpus analysis, we searched for systematic differences in source use and presentation comparing Ramesar’s deceptive news articles with two same-sized sets of reliable articles, 1) articles on similar topics from other journalists, and 2) articles with verifiable sources from Ramesar himself. Results indicate that compared to real news sources, fictitious sources are more often secondary definers, who are presented in more stereotypical ways and through more and longer direct quotations.",
keywords = "Journalism ethics, Linguistic analysis, Content analysis, Fraud detection",
author = "Charlotte Govaert and Luuk Lagerwerf and Celine Klemm",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.5117/TVT2019.1.005.GOVA",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "41",
pages = "61--74",
journal = "Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing",
issn = "1573-9775",
publisher = "Amsterdam University Press",
number = "1",

}

Tekstuele kenmerken van misleidende journalistiek : De zaak-Ramesar. / Govaert, Charlotte; Lagerwerf, Luuk; Klemm, Celine.

In: Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2019, p. 61-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tekstuele kenmerken van misleidende journalistiek

T2 - De zaak-Ramesar

AU - Govaert, Charlotte

AU - Lagerwerf, Luuk

AU - Klemm, Celine

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Trustworthiness is key in journalism, yet some journalists intentionally deceive their audiences by fabricating sources. In 2014, Dutch journalist Perdiep Ramesar was fired from Trouw, an esteemed national newspaper in the Netherlands, after it was discovered that sources in 126 of his articles were ‘non-verifiable’. This poses the question whether untrustworthy news articles may be recognized, for instance by textual characteristics. Using corpus analysis, we searched for systematic differences in source use and presentation comparing Ramesar’s deceptive news articles with two same-sized sets of reliable articles, 1) articles on similar topics from other journalists, and 2) articles with verifiable sources from Ramesar himself. Results indicate that compared to real news sources, fictitious sources are more often secondary definers, who are presented in more stereotypical ways and through more and longer direct quotations.

AB - Trustworthiness is key in journalism, yet some journalists intentionally deceive their audiences by fabricating sources. In 2014, Dutch journalist Perdiep Ramesar was fired from Trouw, an esteemed national newspaper in the Netherlands, after it was discovered that sources in 126 of his articles were ‘non-verifiable’. This poses the question whether untrustworthy news articles may be recognized, for instance by textual characteristics. Using corpus analysis, we searched for systematic differences in source use and presentation comparing Ramesar’s deceptive news articles with two same-sized sets of reliable articles, 1) articles on similar topics from other journalists, and 2) articles with verifiable sources from Ramesar himself. Results indicate that compared to real news sources, fictitious sources are more often secondary definers, who are presented in more stereotypical ways and through more and longer direct quotations.

KW - Journalism ethics

KW - Linguistic analysis

KW - Content analysis

KW - Fraud detection

U2 - 10.5117/TVT2019.1.005.GOVA

DO - 10.5117/TVT2019.1.005.GOVA

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 61

EP - 74

JO - Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing

JF - Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing

SN - 1573-9775

IS - 1

ER -