Temporal relations between mineral deposits and global tectonic cycles

Peter A. Cawood, Chris J. Hawkesworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Mineral deposits are heterogeneously distributed in both space and time, with variations reflecting tectonic setting, evolving environmental conditions, as in the atmosphere and hydrosphere, and secular changes in the Earth's thermal history. The distribution of deposit types whose settings are tied to plate margin processes (e.g. orogenic gold, volcanic-hosted massive sulphide, Mississippi valley type Pb-Zn deposits) correlates well with the supercontinent cycle, whereas deposits related to intra-cratonic settings and mantle-driven igneous events, such as Ni-Cu-PGE deposits, lack a clear association. The episodic distribution of deposits tied to the supercontinent cycle is accentuated by selective preservation and biasing of rock units and events during supercontinent assembly, a process that encases the deposit within the assembled supercontinent and isolates it from subsequent removal and recycling at plate margins.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-21
Number of pages13
JournalGeological Society Special Publication
Volume393
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Silver
  • Silicate mineral
  • Mine

Cite this

@article{609154963a674db4bee3fb0c8952f1b8,
title = "Temporal relations between mineral deposits and global tectonic cycles",
abstract = "Mineral deposits are heterogeneously distributed in both space and time, with variations reflecting tectonic setting, evolving environmental conditions, as in the atmosphere and hydrosphere, and secular changes in the Earth's thermal history. The distribution of deposit types whose settings are tied to plate margin processes (e.g. orogenic gold, volcanic-hosted massive sulphide, Mississippi valley type Pb-Zn deposits) correlates well with the supercontinent cycle, whereas deposits related to intra-cratonic settings and mantle-driven igneous events, such as Ni-Cu-PGE deposits, lack a clear association. The episodic distribution of deposits tied to the supercontinent cycle is accentuated by selective preservation and biasing of rock units and events during supercontinent assembly, a process that encases the deposit within the assembled supercontinent and isolates it from subsequent removal and recycling at plate margins.",
keywords = "Silver, Silicate mineral, Mine",
author = "Cawood, {Peter A.} and Hawkesworth, {Chris J.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1144/SP393.1",
language = "English",
volume = "393",
pages = "9--21",
journal = "Geological Society Special Publication",
issn = "0305-8719",
publisher = "Geological Society",

}

Temporal relations between mineral deposits and global tectonic cycles. / Cawood, Peter A.; Hawkesworth, Chris J.

In: Geological Society Special Publication, Vol. 393, 2015, p. 9-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal relations between mineral deposits and global tectonic cycles

AU - Cawood, Peter A.

AU - Hawkesworth, Chris J.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Mineral deposits are heterogeneously distributed in both space and time, with variations reflecting tectonic setting, evolving environmental conditions, as in the atmosphere and hydrosphere, and secular changes in the Earth's thermal history. The distribution of deposit types whose settings are tied to plate margin processes (e.g. orogenic gold, volcanic-hosted massive sulphide, Mississippi valley type Pb-Zn deposits) correlates well with the supercontinent cycle, whereas deposits related to intra-cratonic settings and mantle-driven igneous events, such as Ni-Cu-PGE deposits, lack a clear association. The episodic distribution of deposits tied to the supercontinent cycle is accentuated by selective preservation and biasing of rock units and events during supercontinent assembly, a process that encases the deposit within the assembled supercontinent and isolates it from subsequent removal and recycling at plate margins.

AB - Mineral deposits are heterogeneously distributed in both space and time, with variations reflecting tectonic setting, evolving environmental conditions, as in the atmosphere and hydrosphere, and secular changes in the Earth's thermal history. The distribution of deposit types whose settings are tied to plate margin processes (e.g. orogenic gold, volcanic-hosted massive sulphide, Mississippi valley type Pb-Zn deposits) correlates well with the supercontinent cycle, whereas deposits related to intra-cratonic settings and mantle-driven igneous events, such as Ni-Cu-PGE deposits, lack a clear association. The episodic distribution of deposits tied to the supercontinent cycle is accentuated by selective preservation and biasing of rock units and events during supercontinent assembly, a process that encases the deposit within the assembled supercontinent and isolates it from subsequent removal and recycling at plate margins.

KW - Silver

KW - Silicate mineral

KW - Mine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921376176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1144/SP393.1

DO - 10.1144/SP393.1

M3 - Article

VL - 393

SP - 9

EP - 21

JO - Geological Society Special Publication

JF - Geological Society Special Publication

SN - 0305-8719

ER -