Technical Note

The use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections

Luca Fiorenza, Robin Yong, Sarbin Ranjitkar, Toby Huges, Michelle Quayle, Paul G. McMenamin, John Kaidonis, Grant C. Townsend, Justin W. Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Rapid prototyping (RP) technology is becoming more affordable, faster, and is now capable of building models with a high resolution and accuracy. Due to technological limitations, 3D printing in biological anthropology has been mostly limited to museum displays and forensic reconstructions. In this study, we compared the accuracy of different 3D printers to establish whether RP can be used effectively to reproduce anthropological dental collections, potentially replacing access to oftentimes fragile and irreplaceable original material.

Methods: We digitized specimens from the Yuendumu collection of Australian Aboriginal dental casts using a high-resolution white-light scanning system and reproduced them using four different 3D printing technologies: stereolithography; fused deposition modeling; binder-jetting; and material-jetting. We compared the deviations between the original 3D surface models with 3D print scans using color maps generated from a 3D metric deviation analysis.

Results: The 3D printed models reproduced both the detail and discrete morphology of the scanned dental casts. The results of the metric deviation analysis demonstrate that all 3D print models were accurate, with only a few small areas of high deviations. The material-jetting and stereolithography printers were found to perform better than the other two printing machines.

Conclusions: The quality of current commercial 3D printers has reached a good level of accuracy and detail reproduction. However, the costs and printing times limit its application to produce large sample numbers for use in most anthropological studies. Nonetheless, RP offers a viable option to preserve numerically constraint fragile skeletal and dental material in paleoanthropological collections.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)400-406
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume167
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Stereolithography
  • 3D Surface Scanning
  • Dental Anthropology
  • Rapid Prototyping
  • Museum Conservation

Cite this

Fiorenza, Luca ; Yong, Robin ; Ranjitkar, Sarbin ; Huges, Toby ; Quayle, Michelle ; McMenamin, Paul G. ; Kaidonis, John ; Townsend, Grant C. ; Adams, Justin W. / Technical Note : The use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections. In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2018 ; Vol. 167, No. 2. pp. 400-406.
@article{3943d99d3b034a57a98dc37ef87efa1b,
title = "Technical Note: The use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections",
abstract = "Objectives: Rapid prototyping (RP) technology is becoming more affordable, faster, and is now capable of building models with a high resolution and accuracy. Due to technological limitations, 3D printing in biological anthropology has been mostly limited to museum displays and forensic reconstructions. In this study, we compared the accuracy of different 3D printers to establish whether RP can be used effectively to reproduce anthropological dental collections, potentially replacing access to oftentimes fragile and irreplaceable original material.Methods: We digitized specimens from the Yuendumu collection of Australian Aboriginal dental casts using a high-resolution white-light scanning system and reproduced them using four different 3D printing technologies: stereolithography; fused deposition modeling; binder-jetting; and material-jetting. We compared the deviations between the original 3D surface models with 3D print scans using color maps generated from a 3D metric deviation analysis.Results: The 3D printed models reproduced both the detail and discrete morphology of the scanned dental casts. The results of the metric deviation analysis demonstrate that all 3D print models were accurate, with only a few small areas of high deviations. The material-jetting and stereolithography printers were found to perform better than the other two printing machines.Conclusions: The quality of current commercial 3D printers has reached a good level of accuracy and detail reproduction. However, the costs and printing times limit its application to produce large sample numbers for use in most anthropological studies. Nonetheless, RP offers a viable option to preserve numerically constraint fragile skeletal and dental material in paleoanthropological collections.",
keywords = "Stereolithography, 3D Surface Scanning, Dental Anthropology, Rapid Prototyping, Museum Conservation",
author = "Luca Fiorenza and Robin Yong and Sarbin Ranjitkar and Toby Huges and Michelle Quayle and McMenamin, {Paul G.} and John Kaidonis and Townsend, {Grant C.} and Adams, {Justin W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.23640",
language = "English",
volume = "167",
pages = "400--406",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Technical Note : The use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections. / Fiorenza, Luca; Yong, Robin; Ranjitkar, Sarbin; Huges, Toby; Quayle, Michelle; McMenamin, Paul G.; Kaidonis, John; Townsend, Grant C.; Adams, Justin W.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 167, No. 2, 10.2018, p. 400-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technical Note

T2 - The use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections

AU - Fiorenza, Luca

AU - Yong, Robin

AU - Ranjitkar, Sarbin

AU - Huges, Toby

AU - Quayle, Michelle

AU - McMenamin, Paul G.

AU - Kaidonis, John

AU - Townsend, Grant C.

AU - Adams, Justin W.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Objectives: Rapid prototyping (RP) technology is becoming more affordable, faster, and is now capable of building models with a high resolution and accuracy. Due to technological limitations, 3D printing in biological anthropology has been mostly limited to museum displays and forensic reconstructions. In this study, we compared the accuracy of different 3D printers to establish whether RP can be used effectively to reproduce anthropological dental collections, potentially replacing access to oftentimes fragile and irreplaceable original material.Methods: We digitized specimens from the Yuendumu collection of Australian Aboriginal dental casts using a high-resolution white-light scanning system and reproduced them using four different 3D printing technologies: stereolithography; fused deposition modeling; binder-jetting; and material-jetting. We compared the deviations between the original 3D surface models with 3D print scans using color maps generated from a 3D metric deviation analysis.Results: The 3D printed models reproduced both the detail and discrete morphology of the scanned dental casts. The results of the metric deviation analysis demonstrate that all 3D print models were accurate, with only a few small areas of high deviations. The material-jetting and stereolithography printers were found to perform better than the other two printing machines.Conclusions: The quality of current commercial 3D printers has reached a good level of accuracy and detail reproduction. However, the costs and printing times limit its application to produce large sample numbers for use in most anthropological studies. Nonetheless, RP offers a viable option to preserve numerically constraint fragile skeletal and dental material in paleoanthropological collections.

AB - Objectives: Rapid prototyping (RP) technology is becoming more affordable, faster, and is now capable of building models with a high resolution and accuracy. Due to technological limitations, 3D printing in biological anthropology has been mostly limited to museum displays and forensic reconstructions. In this study, we compared the accuracy of different 3D printers to establish whether RP can be used effectively to reproduce anthropological dental collections, potentially replacing access to oftentimes fragile and irreplaceable original material.Methods: We digitized specimens from the Yuendumu collection of Australian Aboriginal dental casts using a high-resolution white-light scanning system and reproduced them using four different 3D printing technologies: stereolithography; fused deposition modeling; binder-jetting; and material-jetting. We compared the deviations between the original 3D surface models with 3D print scans using color maps generated from a 3D metric deviation analysis.Results: The 3D printed models reproduced both the detail and discrete morphology of the scanned dental casts. The results of the metric deviation analysis demonstrate that all 3D print models were accurate, with only a few small areas of high deviations. The material-jetting and stereolithography printers were found to perform better than the other two printing machines.Conclusions: The quality of current commercial 3D printers has reached a good level of accuracy and detail reproduction. However, the costs and printing times limit its application to produce large sample numbers for use in most anthropological studies. Nonetheless, RP offers a viable option to preserve numerically constraint fragile skeletal and dental material in paleoanthropological collections.

KW - Stereolithography

KW - 3D Surface Scanning

KW - Dental Anthropology

KW - Rapid Prototyping

KW - Museum Conservation

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.23640

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.23640

M3 - Article

VL - 167

SP - 400

EP - 406

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 2

ER -