Technical considerations for genotyping multi-allelic copy number variation (CNV), in regions of segmental duplication

Stuart Cantsilieris, Patrick Stephen Western, Paul N Baird, Stefan White

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Intrachromosomal segmental duplications provide the substrate for non-allelic homologous recombination, facilitating extensive copy number variation in the human genome. Many multi-copy gene families are embedded within genomic regions with high levels of sequence identity (>95 ) and therefore pose considerable analytical challenges. In some cases, the complexity involved in analyzing such regions is largely underestimated. Rapid, cost effective analysis of multi-copy gene regions have typically implemented quantitative approaches, however quantitative data are not an absolute means of certainty. Therefore any technique prone to degrees of measurement error can produce ambiguous results that may lead to spurious associations with complex disease. RESULTS: In this study we have focused on testing the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative analysis techniques. With reference to the C-C Chemokine Ligand-3-like-1 (CCL3L1) gene, we performed analysis using real-time Quantitative PCR (QPCR), Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Paralogue Ratio Test (PRT). After controlling for potential outside variables on assay performance, including DNA concentration, quality, preparation and storage conditions, we find that real-time QPCR produces data that does not cluster tightly around copy number integer values, with variation substantially greater than that of the MLPA or PRT systems. We find that the method of rounding real-time QPCR measurements can potentially lead to mis-scoring of copy number genotypes and suggest caution should be exercised in interpreting QPCR data. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that real-time QPCR is inherently prone to measurement error, even under conditions that would seem favorable for association studies. Our results indicate that potential variability in the physicochemical properties of the DNA samples cannot solely explain the poor performance exhibited by the real-time QPCR systems. We recommend that more robus
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1 - 8
    Number of pages8
    JournalBMC Genomics
    Volume15
    Issue numberArt. ID: 329
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Cite this

    Cantsilieris, Stuart ; Western, Patrick Stephen ; Baird, Paul N ; White, Stefan. / Technical considerations for genotyping multi-allelic copy number variation (CNV), in regions of segmental duplication. In: BMC Genomics. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. Art. ID: 329. pp. 1 - 8.
    @article{c2b3d4742e0549bca2ebf3421298426b,
    title = "Technical considerations for genotyping multi-allelic copy number variation (CNV), in regions of segmental duplication",
    abstract = "Intrachromosomal segmental duplications provide the substrate for non-allelic homologous recombination, facilitating extensive copy number variation in the human genome. Many multi-copy gene families are embedded within genomic regions with high levels of sequence identity (>95 ) and therefore pose considerable analytical challenges. In some cases, the complexity involved in analyzing such regions is largely underestimated. Rapid, cost effective analysis of multi-copy gene regions have typically implemented quantitative approaches, however quantitative data are not an absolute means of certainty. Therefore any technique prone to degrees of measurement error can produce ambiguous results that may lead to spurious associations with complex disease. RESULTS: In this study we have focused on testing the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative analysis techniques. With reference to the C-C Chemokine Ligand-3-like-1 (CCL3L1) gene, we performed analysis using real-time Quantitative PCR (QPCR), Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Paralogue Ratio Test (PRT). After controlling for potential outside variables on assay performance, including DNA concentration, quality, preparation and storage conditions, we find that real-time QPCR produces data that does not cluster tightly around copy number integer values, with variation substantially greater than that of the MLPA or PRT systems. We find that the method of rounding real-time QPCR measurements can potentially lead to mis-scoring of copy number genotypes and suggest caution should be exercised in interpreting QPCR data. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that real-time QPCR is inherently prone to measurement error, even under conditions that would seem favorable for association studies. Our results indicate that potential variability in the physicochemical properties of the DNA samples cannot solely explain the poor performance exhibited by the real-time QPCR systems. We recommend that more robus",
    author = "Stuart Cantsilieris and Western, {Patrick Stephen} and Baird, {Paul N} and Stefan White",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1186/1471-2164-15-329",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "1 -- 8",
    journal = "BMC Genomics",
    issn = "1471-2164",
    publisher = "BioMed Central",
    number = "Art. ID: 329",

    }

    Technical considerations for genotyping multi-allelic copy number variation (CNV), in regions of segmental duplication. / Cantsilieris, Stuart; Western, Patrick Stephen; Baird, Paul N; White, Stefan.

    In: BMC Genomics, Vol. 15, No. Art. ID: 329, 2014, p. 1 - 8.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Technical considerations for genotyping multi-allelic copy number variation (CNV), in regions of segmental duplication

    AU - Cantsilieris, Stuart

    AU - Western, Patrick Stephen

    AU - Baird, Paul N

    AU - White, Stefan

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Intrachromosomal segmental duplications provide the substrate for non-allelic homologous recombination, facilitating extensive copy number variation in the human genome. Many multi-copy gene families are embedded within genomic regions with high levels of sequence identity (>95 ) and therefore pose considerable analytical challenges. In some cases, the complexity involved in analyzing such regions is largely underestimated. Rapid, cost effective analysis of multi-copy gene regions have typically implemented quantitative approaches, however quantitative data are not an absolute means of certainty. Therefore any technique prone to degrees of measurement error can produce ambiguous results that may lead to spurious associations with complex disease. RESULTS: In this study we have focused on testing the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative analysis techniques. With reference to the C-C Chemokine Ligand-3-like-1 (CCL3L1) gene, we performed analysis using real-time Quantitative PCR (QPCR), Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Paralogue Ratio Test (PRT). After controlling for potential outside variables on assay performance, including DNA concentration, quality, preparation and storage conditions, we find that real-time QPCR produces data that does not cluster tightly around copy number integer values, with variation substantially greater than that of the MLPA or PRT systems. We find that the method of rounding real-time QPCR measurements can potentially lead to mis-scoring of copy number genotypes and suggest caution should be exercised in interpreting QPCR data. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that real-time QPCR is inherently prone to measurement error, even under conditions that would seem favorable for association studies. Our results indicate that potential variability in the physicochemical properties of the DNA samples cannot solely explain the poor performance exhibited by the real-time QPCR systems. We recommend that more robus

    AB - Intrachromosomal segmental duplications provide the substrate for non-allelic homologous recombination, facilitating extensive copy number variation in the human genome. Many multi-copy gene families are embedded within genomic regions with high levels of sequence identity (>95 ) and therefore pose considerable analytical challenges. In some cases, the complexity involved in analyzing such regions is largely underestimated. Rapid, cost effective analysis of multi-copy gene regions have typically implemented quantitative approaches, however quantitative data are not an absolute means of certainty. Therefore any technique prone to degrees of measurement error can produce ambiguous results that may lead to spurious associations with complex disease. RESULTS: In this study we have focused on testing the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative analysis techniques. With reference to the C-C Chemokine Ligand-3-like-1 (CCL3L1) gene, we performed analysis using real-time Quantitative PCR (QPCR), Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Paralogue Ratio Test (PRT). After controlling for potential outside variables on assay performance, including DNA concentration, quality, preparation and storage conditions, we find that real-time QPCR produces data that does not cluster tightly around copy number integer values, with variation substantially greater than that of the MLPA or PRT systems. We find that the method of rounding real-time QPCR measurements can potentially lead to mis-scoring of copy number genotypes and suggest caution should be exercised in interpreting QPCR data. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that real-time QPCR is inherently prone to measurement error, even under conditions that would seem favorable for association studies. Our results indicate that potential variability in the physicochemical properties of the DNA samples cannot solely explain the poor performance exhibited by the real-time QPCR systems. We recommend that more robus

    UR - http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2164-15-329.pdf

    U2 - 10.1186/1471-2164-15-329

    DO - 10.1186/1471-2164-15-329

    M3 - Article

    VL - 15

    SP - 1

    EP - 8

    JO - BMC Genomics

    JF - BMC Genomics

    SN - 1471-2164

    IS - Art. ID: 329

    ER -