TY - JOUR
T1 - Targeting 1.5 degrees with the global carbon footprint of the Australian Capital Territory
AU - Goodwin, Kylie
AU - Allen, Cameron
AU - Teh, Soo Huey
AU - Li, Mengyu
AU - Fry, Jacob
AU - Lenzen, Manfred
AU - Farrelly, Serena
AU - Leon, Constanza
AU - Lewis, Sophie
AU - Chen, Guangwu
AU - Schandl, Heinz
AU - Wiedmann, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the ACT Office of the Commissioner for Sustainability and the Environment. It was financially supported by the Australian Research Council (project number DP190102277 ) and the Research Council of Norway (project number 287690 ). Guangwu Chen acknowledges the support of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant NO. 2020M680440 ). Kylie Goodwin acknowledges the support of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. The Honours Thesis of Claudia Burbidge, titled ‘Carbon Neutrality Assessment of the ACT’ from 2018 provided inputs to some parts of this work. Daniel Micevski supported the IELab and retrieved greenhouse gas emissions data online. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers who provided useful feedback that has improved the quality of the document.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - In 2019 the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) government stated an ambition to prioritise reduction of Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, the size of which had not been fully quantified previously. This study calculated the total carbon footprint of the ACT in 2018, including Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions and modelled scenarios to reduce all emissions in line with a 1.5 °C target approach. This is the first time a multi-scale analysis of local, sub-national and international supply chains has been undertaken for a city, using a nested and trade-adjusted global multi-region input-output model. This allowed for the quantification of global origins and destinations of emissions, which showed that the 2018 carbon footprint for the ACT was approximately 34.7 t CO2-eq/cap, with 83% attributed to Scope 3. Main contributions came from transport, electricity, manufacturing and public administration and safety, with emissions generated primarily in Australian States and Territories. Modelling in accordance with a 1.5 °C warming scenario showed a plausible reduction to 5.2 t CO2-eq/cap by 2045 (excluding offsets or carbon dioxide removal technologies), with remaining emissions predominantly embodied in international supply chains. This study demonstrates the radical changes required by a wealthy Australian city to achieve 1.5 °C compliance and identifies sectors and supply chains for prioritising policies to best achieve this outcome.
AB - In 2019 the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) government stated an ambition to prioritise reduction of Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, the size of which had not been fully quantified previously. This study calculated the total carbon footprint of the ACT in 2018, including Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions and modelled scenarios to reduce all emissions in line with a 1.5 °C target approach. This is the first time a multi-scale analysis of local, sub-national and international supply chains has been undertaken for a city, using a nested and trade-adjusted global multi-region input-output model. This allowed for the quantification of global origins and destinations of emissions, which showed that the 2018 carbon footprint for the ACT was approximately 34.7 t CO2-eq/cap, with 83% attributed to Scope 3. Main contributions came from transport, electricity, manufacturing and public administration and safety, with emissions generated primarily in Australian States and Territories. Modelling in accordance with a 1.5 °C warming scenario showed a plausible reduction to 5.2 t CO2-eq/cap by 2045 (excluding offsets or carbon dioxide removal technologies), with remaining emissions predominantly embodied in international supply chains. This study demonstrates the radical changes required by a wealthy Australian city to achieve 1.5 °C compliance and identifies sectors and supply chains for prioritising policies to best achieve this outcome.
KW - Climate policy
KW - Consumption-based accounting
KW - Mitigation policies
KW - Multi-region input-output analysis
KW - Scope 3
KW - Urban sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151424816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.006
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85151424816
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 144
SP - 137
EP - 150
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
ER -