Tangibility and investment irreversibility in asset pricing

Paul Docherty, Howard Chan, Steve Easton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


Zhang (2005) and Cooper (2006) provide a theoretical risk-based explanation for the value premium by suggesting a nexus between firms' book-to-market ratio and investment irreversibility. They argue that unproductive physical capacity is costly in contracting conditions but provides growth opportunities during economic expansions, resulting in covariant risk between firms' investment in tangible assets and market-wide returns. This article uses the Australian accounting environment to empirically test this theory - a test that is not possible using US data. Consistent with the theoretical argument, tangibility is priced in equity returns, and augmenting the Fama and French three-factor model with a tangibility factor increases model explanatory power.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)809-827
Number of pages19
JournalAccounting & Finance
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes


  • Asset pricing
  • Fama-French model
  • Investment irreversibility
  • Tangibility of assets

Cite this