TY - JOUR
T1 - “Taking the most delicate care”
T2 - Beginnings of a mentoring relationship between teachers and coaches in an Australian school
AU - Southcott, Jane
AU - Marangio, Karen
AU - Rady, Donna
AU - Gindidis, Maria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2020: Jane Southcott, Karen Marangio, Donna Rady, Maria Gindidis, and Nova Southeastern University.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - We explore the beginnings of professional coaching/mentoring relationships between teachers and university mentors in an Australian school. Often overlooked, initial steps are crucial, holding the seeds of eventual success or failure. Our mentoring program was undertaken in a large, independent, coeducational school in suburban Melbourne, Victoria. In our constructivist study, underpinned by our desire to explore on the lived experiences of others, we report on the understandings of three of the mentors/ researchers and the teachers that they worked with. We gathered data from teacher-written statements and mentor journals. Using thematic analysis, we developed our findings, performing epoché as we hold both insider and outsider mentor/researcher perspectives. We present our findings under two broad headings: The prior understandings held by all and addresses positions, assertions and anticipations; and First meetings, finding accords, noticing resistances, and recognizing difficulties. We found that the apparent simplicity of first steps masked great complexity. No one entered the first meeting as an “empty vessel.” Some relationships were more problematic than others. Our goals as transformational educator/ mentors were to foster deep collaborative, professional relationships with our mentees but were hampered by inherent differences of understanding with the school who sought transactional coaches. Clarity in intent from the outset is crucial to program success.
AB - We explore the beginnings of professional coaching/mentoring relationships between teachers and university mentors in an Australian school. Often overlooked, initial steps are crucial, holding the seeds of eventual success or failure. Our mentoring program was undertaken in a large, independent, coeducational school in suburban Melbourne, Victoria. In our constructivist study, underpinned by our desire to explore on the lived experiences of others, we report on the understandings of three of the mentors/ researchers and the teachers that they worked with. We gathered data from teacher-written statements and mentor journals. Using thematic analysis, we developed our findings, performing epoché as we hold both insider and outsider mentor/researcher perspectives. We present our findings under two broad headings: The prior understandings held by all and addresses positions, assertions and anticipations; and First meetings, finding accords, noticing resistances, and recognizing difficulties. We found that the apparent simplicity of first steps masked great complexity. No one entered the first meeting as an “empty vessel.” Some relationships were more problematic than others. Our goals as transformational educator/ mentors were to foster deep collaborative, professional relationships with our mentees but were hampered by inherent differences of understanding with the school who sought transactional coaches. Clarity in intent from the outset is crucial to program success.
KW - Mentoring Teachers
KW - Coaching Teachers
KW - Collaborative Professional Relationships
KW - Beginning Mentoring
KW - Accords and Resistances
KW - Thematic Analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122501140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4546
DO - 10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4546
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122501140
SN - 1052-0147
VL - 25
SP - 1905
EP - 1918
JO - The Qualitative Report
JF - The Qualitative Report
IS - 7
ER -