Taking the Border for a Walk

A reflection on the agonies and ecstasies of exploratory research

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Hypothesis testing using both quantitative and qualitative methods is a respected method in social science research. However other strands of social inquiry adopt a more open-ended and flexible approach. In this chapter, I discuss the benefits and pitfalls of exploratory approaches to researching the border, using my own experience of ‘taking the border for a walk’. I begin by setting out some key ideas about exploratory research as an epistemological perspective for social researchers, contrasting its inductive approach with the deductive orientation more characteristic of hypothesis testing. While they may appear to be polar opposites, I argue that ‘scientific’ inquiry relies on creative insights to a greater degree than is often acknowledged, while the apparent flouting of established methodological principles in exploratory research belies the deeper logic and discipline that is needed to keep this potentially wayward methodology on track.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCriminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility
EditorsAndriani Fili, Synnove Jahnsen, Rebecca Powell
Place of PublicationAbingdon Oxon UK
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter1
Pages15-27
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781315269771
ISBN (Print)9781138284128
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2018

Publication series

NameRoutledge Studies in Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship
PublisherRoutledge

Keywords

  • borders
  • exploratory research
  • border as method
  • border epistemology

Cite this

Weber, L. (2018). Taking the Border for a Walk: A reflection on the agonies and ecstasies of exploratory research. In A. Fili, S. Jahnsen, & R. Powell (Eds.), Criminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility (pp. 15-27). (Routledge Studies in Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship). Abingdon Oxon UK: Routledge.
Weber, Leanne. / Taking the Border for a Walk : A reflection on the agonies and ecstasies of exploratory research. Criminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility. editor / Andriani Fili ; Synnove Jahnsen ; Rebecca Powell. Abingdon Oxon UK : Routledge, 2018. pp. 15-27 (Routledge Studies in Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship).
@inbook{697c92d0482e4a76abc497595efb1e65,
title = "Taking the Border for a Walk: A reflection on the agonies and ecstasies of exploratory research",
abstract = "Hypothesis testing using both quantitative and qualitative methods is a respected method in social science research. However other strands of social inquiry adopt a more open-ended and flexible approach. In this chapter, I discuss the benefits and pitfalls of exploratory approaches to researching the border, using my own experience of ‘taking the border for a walk’. I begin by setting out some key ideas about exploratory research as an epistemological perspective for social researchers, contrasting its inductive approach with the deductive orientation more characteristic of hypothesis testing. While they may appear to be polar opposites, I argue that ‘scientific’ inquiry relies on creative insights to a greater degree than is often acknowledged, while the apparent flouting of established methodological principles in exploratory research belies the deeper logic and discipline that is needed to keep this potentially wayward methodology on track.",
keywords = "borders, exploratory research, border as method, border epistemology",
author = "Leanne Weber",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "3",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138284128",
series = "Routledge Studies in Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship",
publisher = "Routledge",
pages = "15--27",
editor = "Andriani Fili and Synnove Jahnsen and Rebecca Powell",
booktitle = "Criminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Weber, L 2018, Taking the Border for a Walk: A reflection on the agonies and ecstasies of exploratory research. in A Fili, S Jahnsen & R Powell (eds), Criminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility. Routledge Studies in Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship, Routledge, Abingdon Oxon UK, pp. 15-27.

Taking the Border for a Walk : A reflection on the agonies and ecstasies of exploratory research. / Weber, Leanne.

Criminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility. ed. / Andriani Fili; Synnove Jahnsen; Rebecca Powell. Abingdon Oxon UK : Routledge, 2018. p. 15-27 (Routledge Studies in Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Taking the Border for a Walk

T2 - A reflection on the agonies and ecstasies of exploratory research

AU - Weber, Leanne

PY - 2018/5/3

Y1 - 2018/5/3

N2 - Hypothesis testing using both quantitative and qualitative methods is a respected method in social science research. However other strands of social inquiry adopt a more open-ended and flexible approach. In this chapter, I discuss the benefits and pitfalls of exploratory approaches to researching the border, using my own experience of ‘taking the border for a walk’. I begin by setting out some key ideas about exploratory research as an epistemological perspective for social researchers, contrasting its inductive approach with the deductive orientation more characteristic of hypothesis testing. While they may appear to be polar opposites, I argue that ‘scientific’ inquiry relies on creative insights to a greater degree than is often acknowledged, while the apparent flouting of established methodological principles in exploratory research belies the deeper logic and discipline that is needed to keep this potentially wayward methodology on track.

AB - Hypothesis testing using both quantitative and qualitative methods is a respected method in social science research. However other strands of social inquiry adopt a more open-ended and flexible approach. In this chapter, I discuss the benefits and pitfalls of exploratory approaches to researching the border, using my own experience of ‘taking the border for a walk’. I begin by setting out some key ideas about exploratory research as an epistemological perspective for social researchers, contrasting its inductive approach with the deductive orientation more characteristic of hypothesis testing. While they may appear to be polar opposites, I argue that ‘scientific’ inquiry relies on creative insights to a greater degree than is often acknowledged, while the apparent flouting of established methodological principles in exploratory research belies the deeper logic and discipline that is needed to keep this potentially wayward methodology on track.

KW - borders

KW - exploratory research

KW - border as method

KW - border epistemology

UR - https://www.routledge.com/Criminal-Justice-Research-in-an-Era-of-Mass-Mobility/Fili-Jahnsen-Powell/p/book/9781138284128

M3 - Chapter (Book)

SN - 9781138284128

T3 - Routledge Studies in Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship

SP - 15

EP - 27

BT - Criminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility

A2 - Fili, Andriani

A2 - Jahnsen, Synnove

A2 - Powell, Rebecca

PB - Routledge

CY - Abingdon Oxon UK

ER -

Weber L. Taking the Border for a Walk: A reflection on the agonies and ecstasies of exploratory research. In Fili A, Jahnsen S, Powell R, editors, Criminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility. Abingdon Oxon UK: Routledge. 2018. p. 15-27. (Routledge Studies in Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship).