TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review of GIS and remote sensing applications for assessing the socioeconomic impacts of mining
AU - Ang, Michelle Li Ern
AU - Owen, John R.
AU - Gibbins, Christopher N.
AU - Lèbre, Éléonore
AU - Kemp, Deanna
AU - Saputra, Muhamad Risqi U.
AU - Everingham, Jo Anne
AU - Lechner, Alex M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to acknowledge and thank Cate Heine whose early efforts helped lay the foundation for this project. We are also appreciative of the feedback provided by the anonymous reviewers. This research is supported in part by Google Research Scholar program.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/8/5
Y1 - 2023/8/5
N2 - As the mining industry expands, a comprehensive understanding of its socioeconomic risks and benefits is urgently needed. This paper systematically reviews 71 studies (1996–2021) that utilized spatially integrated approaches to evaluate socioeconomic mining impacts. The number of studies that utilize geographic information systems and remote sensing to study mining impacts increased from 2014 onwards. A framework was used to classify the mining impacts studied in the literature and all eight framework categories – Environment, Land, People, Community, Culture, Livelihoods, Infrastructure and Housing – were captured by the literature though Culture was least studied. Coal mining, active mining phase, Landsat data and classic remote sensing algorithms were most highlighted. Future research should focus on advancing geospatial technology like artificial intelligence (AI) to better capture intangible socioeconomic impacts, under-researched minerals and long-term mine lifecycle components. Spatially referenced social data can improve stakeholder involvement and support spatially explicit planning to ensure sustainability.
AB - As the mining industry expands, a comprehensive understanding of its socioeconomic risks and benefits is urgently needed. This paper systematically reviews 71 studies (1996–2021) that utilized spatially integrated approaches to evaluate socioeconomic mining impacts. The number of studies that utilize geographic information systems and remote sensing to study mining impacts increased from 2014 onwards. A framework was used to classify the mining impacts studied in the literature and all eight framework categories – Environment, Land, People, Community, Culture, Livelihoods, Infrastructure and Housing – were captured by the literature though Culture was least studied. Coal mining, active mining phase, Landsat data and classic remote sensing algorithms were most highlighted. Future research should focus on advancing geospatial technology like artificial intelligence (AI) to better capture intangible socioeconomic impacts, under-researched minerals and long-term mine lifecycle components. Spatially referenced social data can improve stakeholder involvement and support spatially explicit planning to ensure sustainability.
KW - GIS
KW - impact assessment
KW - mining
KW - remote sensing
KW - socioeconomic impacts
KW - spatially integrated social sciences
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85166916392
U2 - 10.1177/10704965231190126
DO - 10.1177/10704965231190126
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85166916392
SN - 1070-4965
VL - 32
JO - Journal of Environment and Development
JF - Journal of Environment and Development
IS - 3
ER -