Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative: patient-centred outcomes

S. R. Moonesinghe, A. I.R. Jackson, O. Boney, N. Stevenson, M. T.V. Chan, T. M. Cook, M. Lane-Fall, C. Kalkman, M. D. Neuman, U. Nilsson, M. Shulman, P. S. Myles, on behalf of the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine-Core Outcome Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) Group

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patient-centred outcomes are increasingly used in perioperative clinical trials. The Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative aims to define which measures should be used in future research to facilitate comparison between studies and to enable robust evidence synthesis. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to create a longlist of patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, functional status, patient well-being, and life-impact measures for consideration. A three-stage Delphi consensus process involving 89 international experts was then conducted in order to refine this list into a set of recommendations. Results: The literature review yielded six patient-satisfaction measures, seven generic health-related quality-of-life measures, eight patient well-being measures, five functional-status measures, and five life-impact measures for consideration. The Delphi response rates were 92%, 87%, and 100% for Rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three additional measures were added during the Delphi process as a result of contributions from the StEP group members. Firm recommendations have been made about one health-related quality-of-life measure (EuroQol 5 Dimension, five-level version with visual analogue scale), one functional-status measure (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule version 2.0, 12-question version), and one life-impact measure (days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery). Recommendations with caveats have been made about the Bauer patient-satisfaction measure and two life-impact measures (days alive and out of hospital at 1 yr after surgery, and discharge destination). Conclusions: Several patient-centred outcome measures have been recommended for use in future perioperative studies. We suggest that every clinical study should consider using at least one patient-centred outcome within a suite of endpoints.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)664-670
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume123
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • clinical indicators
  • clinical trials
  • outcome measures
  • patient well-being
  • perioperative medicine
  • quality of life
  • standardised endpoint

Cite this