System complexities affecting recovery after a minor transport-related injury

The need for a person-centred approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand clients' experiences of the recovery journey through the compensation system and to identify areas and strategies for quality improvement. METHODS: A qualitative study of 23 participants with physical or mental disabilities caused by traffic accidents, which occurred, on average, 4 years ago. Purposive sampling of long-term recovery clients who made a compensation claim after their injuries was applied until data saturation was reached. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed through conventional thematic analysis. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that recovery is a complex phenomenon that can be impacted by numerous challenges of navigating the compensation system and using its services. Clients perceived the compensation provider as limited in rules around which services they could access. A common perception amongst clients was that the compensation provider did not have the capacity and knowledge to understand health and recovery processes nor did it provide adequate guidelines or instructions that would assist clients with their recovery. Many clients dealt with numerous case managers and felt insufficiently informed on what to expect and do, which led to a lack of trust in rehabilitation management and case managers' decisions. According to clients, financial impacts were neglected and not addressed effectively. Many clients felt abandoned by the system which led to perceived feelings of desertion and negligence. CONCLUSION: Understanding modifiable barriers to recovery in compensation systems presents opportunities to amend current practices and consider a holistic, person-centred care approach. It is apparent that improved recovery management, communication and adequate provision of guidelines are needed to meet clients' needs and facilitate better outcomes. A person-centred care approach is likely to improve quality of life and help clients navigate the compensation system more effectively with assistance from health and compensation professionals, who should be actively involved in their recovery processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-126
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • person-centred care
  • recovery
  • health outcomes
  • road trauma
  • minor injuries

Cite this

@article{23d7520801284761957d2bf45efc1dd2,
title = "System complexities affecting recovery after a minor transport-related injury: The need for a person-centred approach",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To understand clients' experiences of the recovery journey through the compensation system and to identify areas and strategies for quality improvement. METHODS: A qualitative study of 23 participants with physical or mental disabilities caused by traffic accidents, which occurred, on average, 4 years ago. Purposive sampling of long-term recovery clients who made a compensation claim after their injuries was applied until data saturation was reached. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed through conventional thematic analysis. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that recovery is a complex phenomenon that can be impacted by numerous challenges of navigating the compensation system and using its services. Clients perceived the compensation provider as limited in rules around which services they could access. A common perception amongst clients was that the compensation provider did not have the capacity and knowledge to understand health and recovery processes nor did it provide adequate guidelines or instructions that would assist clients with their recovery. Many clients dealt with numerous case managers and felt insufficiently informed on what to expect and do, which led to a lack of trust in rehabilitation management and case managers' decisions. According to clients, financial impacts were neglected and not addressed effectively. Many clients felt abandoned by the system which led to perceived feelings of desertion and negligence. CONCLUSION: Understanding modifiable barriers to recovery in compensation systems presents opportunities to amend current practices and consider a holistic, person-centred care approach. It is apparent that improved recovery management, communication and adequate provision of guidelines are needed to meet clients' needs and facilitate better outcomes. A person-centred care approach is likely to improve quality of life and help clients navigate the compensation system more effectively with assistance from health and compensation professionals, who should be actively involved in their recovery processes.",
keywords = "person-centred care, recovery, health outcomes, road trauma, minor injuries",
author = "Stella Samoborec and Darshini Ayton and Rasa Ruseckaite and Gary Winbolt and Evans, {Sue M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2340/16501977-2500",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "120--126",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - System complexities affecting recovery after a minor transport-related injury

T2 - The need for a person-centred approach

AU - Samoborec, Stella

AU - Ayton, Darshini

AU - Ruseckaite, Rasa

AU - Winbolt, Gary

AU - Evans, Sue M.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To understand clients' experiences of the recovery journey through the compensation system and to identify areas and strategies for quality improvement. METHODS: A qualitative study of 23 participants with physical or mental disabilities caused by traffic accidents, which occurred, on average, 4 years ago. Purposive sampling of long-term recovery clients who made a compensation claim after their injuries was applied until data saturation was reached. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed through conventional thematic analysis. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that recovery is a complex phenomenon that can be impacted by numerous challenges of navigating the compensation system and using its services. Clients perceived the compensation provider as limited in rules around which services they could access. A common perception amongst clients was that the compensation provider did not have the capacity and knowledge to understand health and recovery processes nor did it provide adequate guidelines or instructions that would assist clients with their recovery. Many clients dealt with numerous case managers and felt insufficiently informed on what to expect and do, which led to a lack of trust in rehabilitation management and case managers' decisions. According to clients, financial impacts were neglected and not addressed effectively. Many clients felt abandoned by the system which led to perceived feelings of desertion and negligence. CONCLUSION: Understanding modifiable barriers to recovery in compensation systems presents opportunities to amend current practices and consider a holistic, person-centred care approach. It is apparent that improved recovery management, communication and adequate provision of guidelines are needed to meet clients' needs and facilitate better outcomes. A person-centred care approach is likely to improve quality of life and help clients navigate the compensation system more effectively with assistance from health and compensation professionals, who should be actively involved in their recovery processes.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To understand clients' experiences of the recovery journey through the compensation system and to identify areas and strategies for quality improvement. METHODS: A qualitative study of 23 participants with physical or mental disabilities caused by traffic accidents, which occurred, on average, 4 years ago. Purposive sampling of long-term recovery clients who made a compensation claim after their injuries was applied until data saturation was reached. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed through conventional thematic analysis. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that recovery is a complex phenomenon that can be impacted by numerous challenges of navigating the compensation system and using its services. Clients perceived the compensation provider as limited in rules around which services they could access. A common perception amongst clients was that the compensation provider did not have the capacity and knowledge to understand health and recovery processes nor did it provide adequate guidelines or instructions that would assist clients with their recovery. Many clients dealt with numerous case managers and felt insufficiently informed on what to expect and do, which led to a lack of trust in rehabilitation management and case managers' decisions. According to clients, financial impacts were neglected and not addressed effectively. Many clients felt abandoned by the system which led to perceived feelings of desertion and negligence. CONCLUSION: Understanding modifiable barriers to recovery in compensation systems presents opportunities to amend current practices and consider a holistic, person-centred care approach. It is apparent that improved recovery management, communication and adequate provision of guidelines are needed to meet clients' needs and facilitate better outcomes. A person-centred care approach is likely to improve quality of life and help clients navigate the compensation system more effectively with assistance from health and compensation professionals, who should be actively involved in their recovery processes.

KW - person-centred care

KW - recovery

KW - health outcomes

KW - road trauma

KW - minor injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060943296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2340/16501977-2500

DO - 10.2340/16501977-2500

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 120

EP - 126

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 2

ER -