Surnaming children born to lesbian and heterosexual couples: displaying family legitimacy to diverse audiences

Deborah Dempsey, Jo Lindsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Surnaming practices are a case study of change and continuity in patrilineal conventions in families and also alert us to the challenges of negotiating familial identities in an era of family diversity. Using data from two Australian sources, 430,753 Victorian birth registrations and 43 in-depth interviews with heterosexual and lesbian parents, we explore continuity and breaks with convention in surnaming children. For married and unmarried heterosexual couples, the dominant surnaming practice was for children to take their father’s name. By contrast, several surnaming strategies were more popular among lesbian couples including: using hyphenated or double-barrelled surnames, using the birth or non-birth mother’s surname or creating a new name for the family. Despite these differences, we contend that through their surnaming decisions both lesbian and heterosexual couples are concerned with displaying the legitimacy of their parental relationships to extended family and institutional audiences. For unmarried heterosexual couples, surnames display ‘intact’ families and paternal commitment whereas for lesbian couples the legitimacy concern is the recognition of the same-sex couple as parents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1017-1034
Number of pages18
JournalSociology
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • cohabitation
  • family display
  • lesbian parents
  • marriage
  • patrilineage
  • same-sex couples
  • surnames

Cite this

@article{df23611a89684e6b9a6daee5b5fdafd8,
title = "Surnaming children born to lesbian and heterosexual couples: displaying family legitimacy to diverse audiences",
abstract = "Surnaming practices are a case study of change and continuity in patrilineal conventions in families and also alert us to the challenges of negotiating familial identities in an era of family diversity. Using data from two Australian sources, 430,753 Victorian birth registrations and 43 in-depth interviews with heterosexual and lesbian parents, we explore continuity and breaks with convention in surnaming children. For married and unmarried heterosexual couples, the dominant surnaming practice was for children to take their father’s name. By contrast, several surnaming strategies were more popular among lesbian couples including: using hyphenated or double-barrelled surnames, using the birth or non-birth mother’s surname or creating a new name for the family. Despite these differences, we contend that through their surnaming decisions both lesbian and heterosexual couples are concerned with displaying the legitimacy of their parental relationships to extended family and institutional audiences. For unmarried heterosexual couples, surnames display ‘intact’ families and paternal commitment whereas for lesbian couples the legitimacy concern is the recognition of the same-sex couple as parents.",
keywords = "cohabitation, family display, lesbian parents, marriage, patrilineage, same-sex couples, surnames",
author = "Deborah Dempsey and Jo Lindsay",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/0038038517696218",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1017--1034",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Surnaming children born to lesbian and heterosexual couples : displaying family legitimacy to diverse audiences. / Dempsey, Deborah; Lindsay, Jo.

In: Sociology, Vol. 52, No. 5, 2018, p. 1017-1034.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surnaming children born to lesbian and heterosexual couples

T2 - displaying family legitimacy to diverse audiences

AU - Dempsey, Deborah

AU - Lindsay, Jo

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Surnaming practices are a case study of change and continuity in patrilineal conventions in families and also alert us to the challenges of negotiating familial identities in an era of family diversity. Using data from two Australian sources, 430,753 Victorian birth registrations and 43 in-depth interviews with heterosexual and lesbian parents, we explore continuity and breaks with convention in surnaming children. For married and unmarried heterosexual couples, the dominant surnaming practice was for children to take their father’s name. By contrast, several surnaming strategies were more popular among lesbian couples including: using hyphenated or double-barrelled surnames, using the birth or non-birth mother’s surname or creating a new name for the family. Despite these differences, we contend that through their surnaming decisions both lesbian and heterosexual couples are concerned with displaying the legitimacy of their parental relationships to extended family and institutional audiences. For unmarried heterosexual couples, surnames display ‘intact’ families and paternal commitment whereas for lesbian couples the legitimacy concern is the recognition of the same-sex couple as parents.

AB - Surnaming practices are a case study of change and continuity in patrilineal conventions in families and also alert us to the challenges of negotiating familial identities in an era of family diversity. Using data from two Australian sources, 430,753 Victorian birth registrations and 43 in-depth interviews with heterosexual and lesbian parents, we explore continuity and breaks with convention in surnaming children. For married and unmarried heterosexual couples, the dominant surnaming practice was for children to take their father’s name. By contrast, several surnaming strategies were more popular among lesbian couples including: using hyphenated or double-barrelled surnames, using the birth or non-birth mother’s surname or creating a new name for the family. Despite these differences, we contend that through their surnaming decisions both lesbian and heterosexual couples are concerned with displaying the legitimacy of their parental relationships to extended family and institutional audiences. For unmarried heterosexual couples, surnames display ‘intact’ families and paternal commitment whereas for lesbian couples the legitimacy concern is the recognition of the same-sex couple as parents.

KW - cohabitation

KW - family display

KW - lesbian parents

KW - marriage

KW - patrilineage

KW - same-sex couples

KW - surnames

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036605286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0038038517696218

DO - 10.1177/0038038517696218

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 1017

EP - 1034

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 5

ER -