TY - JOUR
T1 - Surface-strip coal mine land rehabilitation planning in South Africa and Australia
T2 - maturity and opportunities for improvement
AU - Weyer, Vanessa D.
AU - Truter, Wayne F.
AU - Lechner, Alex M.
AU - Unger, Corinne J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Contributions are gratefully acknowledged from David Mulligan, Tim O’Connor, Peter Kuyler, James Lake, Phil Tanner and Janice Tooley. The anonymous reviewers are thanked for their valuable contributions to improving the quality of the paper. The University of Pretoria and the Coaltech Research Association are thanked for funding the research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - At the mine approval phase, there is logically a focus on mine start-up and operational requirements, however, insufficient attention is given to rehabilitation planning aspects. To evaluate how rehabilitation planning is addressed upfront, we proposed a maturity model, which consists of three maturity performance indicators measured for seven environmental domain evaluative criteria. The maturity model, was applied to mine rehabilitation guidelines and mine approval consultant rehabilitation reports in South Africa and Australia, Queensland and New South Wales. We found that these documents were vulnerable to adequate, but not yet resilient, i.e. rehabilitation information was gathered, but seldom analysed, with limited integration and rehabilitation risk determination. Legislation, as well as the temporary and dynamic nature of mining, may inadvertently be contributing to immaturity. We conclude by discussing ways forward and the need to determine upfront, a site's total rehabilitation failure risk, as an aid to improving rehabilitation planning.
AB - At the mine approval phase, there is logically a focus on mine start-up and operational requirements, however, insufficient attention is given to rehabilitation planning aspects. To evaluate how rehabilitation planning is addressed upfront, we proposed a maturity model, which consists of three maturity performance indicators measured for seven environmental domain evaluative criteria. The maturity model, was applied to mine rehabilitation guidelines and mine approval consultant rehabilitation reports in South Africa and Australia, Queensland and New South Wales. We found that these documents were vulnerable to adequate, but not yet resilient, i.e. rehabilitation information was gathered, but seldom analysed, with limited integration and rehabilitation risk determination. Legislation, as well as the temporary and dynamic nature of mining, may inadvertently be contributing to immaturity. We conclude by discussing ways forward and the need to determine upfront, a site's total rehabilitation failure risk, as an aid to improving rehabilitation planning.
KW - Cumulative impacts
KW - Environmental planning
KW - Integrated modelling
KW - Maturity models
KW - Mine closure and rehabilitation
KW - Mineral legislation
KW - Multi-discipline
KW - Risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033724413&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.09.013
DO - 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.09.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85033724413
SN - 0301-4207
VL - 54
SP - 117
EP - 129
JO - Resources Policy
JF - Resources Policy
ER -