Successful team-based development of an online course with an external partner: An analysis of the perspectives of academics

Sharon Croxford, Colleen Thomas, Deanna Horvath, Melissa Buultjens, Emma Stirling, Amy E Larsen, Tania Romano Stasis, Jessica Radcliffe, Phil Buultjens, Stuart McDonald, Adrienne Forsyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Course and subject development teams are increasingly seen in the tertiary online teaching environment and they face a unique set of challenges. The purpose of this study was to synthesise and share learnings of 12 academics involved in the development of subjects with an external partner for a new multidisciplinary online health science course at an Australian university, in order to improve ongoing development within the course and inform new course development. In this case study, thematic analysis of focus group discussions and qualitative survey data identified five key themes related to the development process: time management, setting expectations, communication, the development team, and ownership. Barriers to productive subject development included unrealistic timelines, unclear lines of communication, unmet or unrealistic expectations and lack of recognition of team members’ expertise, and lack of support for genuine collaboration. Team-based development of an online course has the potential to be a rewarding experience for academics. In order for the benefits to be realised, approaches to development underpinned by a community-centred framework, observing core values such as collaboration, shared sense of purpose and expectations, would address a number of the issues identified in this study.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5
JournalJournal of University Teaching & Learning Practice
Volume16
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Collaborative online subject/course (individual unit of study) development
  • Expectations of learning design process/platform
  • External education business partner
  • Institutional support/resourcing
  • Subject/course development teams

Cite this

Croxford, S., Thomas, C., Horvath, D., Buultjens, M., Stirling, E., Larsen, A. E., ... Forsyth, A. (2019). Successful team-based development of an online course with an external partner: An analysis of the perspectives of academics. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(1), [5].
Croxford, Sharon ; Thomas, Colleen ; Horvath, Deanna ; Buultjens, Melissa ; Stirling, Emma ; Larsen, Amy E ; Romano Stasis, Tania ; Radcliffe, Jessica ; Buultjens, Phil ; McDonald, Stuart ; Forsyth, Adrienne. / Successful team-based development of an online course with an external partner : An analysis of the perspectives of academics. In: Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. 2019 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{06bc17e7b3604deda5c5c71bba8acc92,
title = "Successful team-based development of an online course with an external partner: An analysis of the perspectives of academics",
abstract = "Course and subject development teams are increasingly seen in the tertiary online teaching environment and they face a unique set of challenges. The purpose of this study was to synthesise and share learnings of 12 academics involved in the development of subjects with an external partner for a new multidisciplinary online health science course at an Australian university, in order to improve ongoing development within the course and inform new course development. In this case study, thematic analysis of focus group discussions and qualitative survey data identified five key themes related to the development process: time management, setting expectations, communication, the development team, and ownership. Barriers to productive subject development included unrealistic timelines, unclear lines of communication, unmet or unrealistic expectations and lack of recognition of team members’ expertise, and lack of support for genuine collaboration. Team-based development of an online course has the potential to be a rewarding experience for academics. In order for the benefits to be realised, approaches to development underpinned by a community-centred framework, observing core values such as collaboration, shared sense of purpose and expectations, would address a number of the issues identified in this study.",
keywords = "Collaborative online subject/course (individual unit of study) development, Expectations of learning design process/platform, External education business partner, Institutional support/resourcing, Subject/course development teams",
author = "Sharon Croxford and Colleen Thomas and Deanna Horvath and Melissa Buultjens and Emma Stirling and Larsen, {Amy E} and {Romano Stasis}, Tania and Jessica Radcliffe and Phil Buultjens and Stuart McDonald and Adrienne Forsyth",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice",
issn = "1449-9789",
number = "1",

}

Croxford, S, Thomas, C, Horvath, D, Buultjens, M, Stirling, E, Larsen, AE, Romano Stasis, T, Radcliffe, J, Buultjens, P, McDonald, S & Forsyth, A 2019, 'Successful team-based development of an online course with an external partner: An analysis of the perspectives of academics' Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 16, no. 1, 5.

Successful team-based development of an online course with an external partner : An analysis of the perspectives of academics. / Croxford, Sharon; Thomas, Colleen; Horvath, Deanna; Buultjens, Melissa; Stirling, Emma; Larsen, Amy E; Romano Stasis, Tania; Radcliffe, Jessica ; Buultjens, Phil; McDonald, Stuart; Forsyth, Adrienne.

In: Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, Vol. 16, No. 1, 5, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Successful team-based development of an online course with an external partner

T2 - An analysis of the perspectives of academics

AU - Croxford, Sharon

AU - Thomas, Colleen

AU - Horvath, Deanna

AU - Buultjens, Melissa

AU - Stirling, Emma

AU - Larsen, Amy E

AU - Romano Stasis, Tania

AU - Radcliffe, Jessica

AU - Buultjens, Phil

AU - McDonald, Stuart

AU - Forsyth, Adrienne

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Course and subject development teams are increasingly seen in the tertiary online teaching environment and they face a unique set of challenges. The purpose of this study was to synthesise and share learnings of 12 academics involved in the development of subjects with an external partner for a new multidisciplinary online health science course at an Australian university, in order to improve ongoing development within the course and inform new course development. In this case study, thematic analysis of focus group discussions and qualitative survey data identified five key themes related to the development process: time management, setting expectations, communication, the development team, and ownership. Barriers to productive subject development included unrealistic timelines, unclear lines of communication, unmet or unrealistic expectations and lack of recognition of team members’ expertise, and lack of support for genuine collaboration. Team-based development of an online course has the potential to be a rewarding experience for academics. In order for the benefits to be realised, approaches to development underpinned by a community-centred framework, observing core values such as collaboration, shared sense of purpose and expectations, would address a number of the issues identified in this study.

AB - Course and subject development teams are increasingly seen in the tertiary online teaching environment and they face a unique set of challenges. The purpose of this study was to synthesise and share learnings of 12 academics involved in the development of subjects with an external partner for a new multidisciplinary online health science course at an Australian university, in order to improve ongoing development within the course and inform new course development. In this case study, thematic analysis of focus group discussions and qualitative survey data identified five key themes related to the development process: time management, setting expectations, communication, the development team, and ownership. Barriers to productive subject development included unrealistic timelines, unclear lines of communication, unmet or unrealistic expectations and lack of recognition of team members’ expertise, and lack of support for genuine collaboration. Team-based development of an online course has the potential to be a rewarding experience for academics. In order for the benefits to be realised, approaches to development underpinned by a community-centred framework, observing core values such as collaboration, shared sense of purpose and expectations, would address a number of the issues identified in this study.

KW - Collaborative online subject/course (individual unit of study) development

KW - Expectations of learning design process/platform

KW - External education business partner

KW - Institutional support/resourcing

KW - Subject/course development teams

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063987956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice

JF - Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice

SN - 1449-9789

IS - 1

M1 - 5

ER -