TY - JOUR
T1 - Successful team-based development of an online course with an external partner
T2 - An analysis of the perspectives of academics
AU - Croxford, Sharon
AU - Thomas, Colleen
AU - Horvath, Deanna
AU - Buultjens, Melissa
AU - Stirling, Emma
AU - Larsen, Amy E
AU - Romano Stasis, Tania
AU - Radcliffe, Jessica
AU - Buultjens, Phil
AU - McDonald, Stuart
AU - Forsyth, Adrienne
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Course and subject development teams are increasingly seen in the tertiary online teaching environment and they face a unique set of challenges. The purpose of this study was to synthesise and share learnings of 12 academics involved in the development of subjects with an external partner for a new multidisciplinary online health science course at an Australian university, in order to improve ongoing development within the course and inform new course development. In this case study, thematic analysis of focus group discussions and qualitative survey data identified five key themes related to the development process: time management, setting expectations, communication, the development team, and ownership. Barriers to productive subject development included unrealistic timelines, unclear lines of communication, unmet or unrealistic expectations and lack of recognition of team members’ expertise, and lack of support for genuine collaboration. Team-based development of an online course has the potential to be a rewarding experience for academics. In order for the benefits to be realised, approaches to development underpinned by a community-centred framework, observing core values such as collaboration, shared sense of purpose and expectations, would address a number of the issues identified in this study.
AB - Course and subject development teams are increasingly seen in the tertiary online teaching environment and they face a unique set of challenges. The purpose of this study was to synthesise and share learnings of 12 academics involved in the development of subjects with an external partner for a new multidisciplinary online health science course at an Australian university, in order to improve ongoing development within the course and inform new course development. In this case study, thematic analysis of focus group discussions and qualitative survey data identified five key themes related to the development process: time management, setting expectations, communication, the development team, and ownership. Barriers to productive subject development included unrealistic timelines, unclear lines of communication, unmet or unrealistic expectations and lack of recognition of team members’ expertise, and lack of support for genuine collaboration. Team-based development of an online course has the potential to be a rewarding experience for academics. In order for the benefits to be realised, approaches to development underpinned by a community-centred framework, observing core values such as collaboration, shared sense of purpose and expectations, would address a number of the issues identified in this study.
KW - Collaborative online subject/course (individual unit of study) development
KW - Expectations of learning design process/platform
KW - External education business partner
KW - Institutional support/resourcing
KW - Subject/course development teams
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063987956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85063987956
SN - 1449-9789
VL - 16
JO - Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
JF - Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
IS - 1
M1 - 5
ER -