Subjective and objective quality and choice of hospital: evidence from maternal care services in Germany

Daniel Avdic, Giuseppe Moscelli, Adam Pilny, Ieva Sriubaite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We study patient choice of healthcare provider based on both objective and subjective quality measures in the context of maternal care hospital services in Germany. Objective measures are obtained from publicly reported clinical indicators, while subjective measures are based on satisfaction scores from a large and nationwide patient survey. We merge both quality metrics to detailed hospital discharge records and quantify the additional distance expectant mothers are willing to travel to give birth in maternity clinics with higher reported quality. Our results reveal that patients are on average willing to travel 0.1–2.7 additional kilometers for a one standard deviation increase in quality. Patients respond to both objective and subjective quality measures, suggesting that patient satisfaction scores may constitute important complements to clinical indicators when choosing provider.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102229
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Volume68
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Keywords

  • Competition
  • Maternal care
  • Provider choice
  • Quality

Cite this

@article{40a508f1351a410f917cc17f2e574031,
title = "Subjective and objective quality and choice of hospital: evidence from maternal care services in Germany",
abstract = "We study patient choice of healthcare provider based on both objective and subjective quality measures in the context of maternal care hospital services in Germany. Objective measures are obtained from publicly reported clinical indicators, while subjective measures are based on satisfaction scores from a large and nationwide patient survey. We merge both quality metrics to detailed hospital discharge records and quantify the additional distance expectant mothers are willing to travel to give birth in maternity clinics with higher reported quality. Our results reveal that patients are on average willing to travel 0.1–2.7 additional kilometers for a one standard deviation increase in quality. Patients respond to both objective and subjective quality measures, suggesting that patient satisfaction scores may constitute important complements to clinical indicators when choosing provider.",
keywords = "Competition, Maternal care, Provider choice, Quality",
author = "Daniel Avdic and Giuseppe Moscelli and Adam Pilny and Ieva Sriubaite",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102229",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
journal = "Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "0167-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Subjective and objective quality and choice of hospital : evidence from maternal care services in Germany. / Avdic, Daniel; Moscelli, Giuseppe; Pilny, Adam; Sriubaite, Ieva.

In: Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 68, 102229, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjective and objective quality and choice of hospital

T2 - evidence from maternal care services in Germany

AU - Avdic, Daniel

AU - Moscelli, Giuseppe

AU - Pilny, Adam

AU - Sriubaite, Ieva

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - We study patient choice of healthcare provider based on both objective and subjective quality measures in the context of maternal care hospital services in Germany. Objective measures are obtained from publicly reported clinical indicators, while subjective measures are based on satisfaction scores from a large and nationwide patient survey. We merge both quality metrics to detailed hospital discharge records and quantify the additional distance expectant mothers are willing to travel to give birth in maternity clinics with higher reported quality. Our results reveal that patients are on average willing to travel 0.1–2.7 additional kilometers for a one standard deviation increase in quality. Patients respond to both objective and subjective quality measures, suggesting that patient satisfaction scores may constitute important complements to clinical indicators when choosing provider.

AB - We study patient choice of healthcare provider based on both objective and subjective quality measures in the context of maternal care hospital services in Germany. Objective measures are obtained from publicly reported clinical indicators, while subjective measures are based on satisfaction scores from a large and nationwide patient survey. We merge both quality metrics to detailed hospital discharge records and quantify the additional distance expectant mothers are willing to travel to give birth in maternity clinics with higher reported quality. Our results reveal that patients are on average willing to travel 0.1–2.7 additional kilometers for a one standard deviation increase in quality. Patients respond to both objective and subjective quality measures, suggesting that patient satisfaction scores may constitute important complements to clinical indicators when choosing provider.

KW - Competition

KW - Maternal care

KW - Provider choice

KW - Quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072021596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102229

DO - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102229

M3 - Article

C2 - 31521024

AN - SCOPUS:85072021596

VL - 68

JO - Journal of Health Economics

JF - Journal of Health Economics

SN - 0167-6296

M1 - 102229

ER -